Philippines stands up to China | Global News

Philippines stands up to China

By: - NewsLab Lead / @MSantosINQ
/ 01:58 PM July 23, 2015

In this April 20, 2015, file photo, Armed Forces of the Philippines Chief of Staff Gen. Gregorio Pio Catapang, left, points to reveal recent images of China's reclamation activities being done at the disputed islands in the South China Sea during a news conference at Camp Aguinaldo at suburban Quezon City. The Philippines expressed alarm Thursday, May 7, over what it said were escalating Chinese efforts to drive off Filipino aircraft from a disputed South China Sea island garrisoned by Manila, in dangerous confrontations.  AP PHOTO/BULLIT MARQUEZ

In this April 20, 2015, file photo, Armed Forces of the Philippines Chief of Staff Gen. Gregorio Pio Catapang, left, points to recent images of China’s reclamation activities being done in the disputed territories in the South China Sea. The Philippines expressed alarm on May 7, over what it said were escalating Chinese efforts to drive off Filipino aircraft from a disputed South China Sea island garrisoned by Manila, in dangerous confrontations. AP PHOTO/BULLIT MARQUEZ

Philippine presidents have come and gone since the maritime dispute over the South China Sea began as far back as the 1970s but it was only under President Benigno Aquino III that the dispute was formally brought to an international court to settle the legal issues.

Aquino has mentioned the dispute twice in his previous State of the Nation Addresses: in 2011 and in 2012 following the Scarborough shoal standoff.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We do not wish to increase tensions with anyone, but we must let the world know that we are ready to protect what is ours,” Aquino said in his 2011 SONA.

FEATURED STORIES

FULL TEXT: State of the Nation Address 2011: Benigno Aquino III

“We are also studying the possibility of elevating the case on the West Philippine Sea to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), to make certain that all involved nations approach the dispute with calm and forbearance,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

A standoff between Philippine and Chinese ships ensued on April 8, 2012, after several Chinese fishing boats were found illegally poaching in Scarborough shoal, which Manila also calls Bajo de Masinloc and as Panatag Shoal.

Article continues after this advertisement

BACKSTORY: PH, Chinese naval vessels in Scarborough Shoal standoff

Article continues after this advertisement

Endangered and endemic marine species such as giant clams, sharks, and sea turtles were found with the Chinese fishermen.

Philippines South China Sea Scarborough Shoal standoff Chinese poachers

Chinese fishermen stand on top of giant clam shells on board a Chinese fishing vessel at the disputed Scarborough Shoal in this April 10 photo released by the Philippine Navy. AP

Several Chinese Marine Surveillance vessels blocked Philippine authorities from apprehending the fishermen causing a standoff that lasted for several days.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Chinese fishermen entered our territory. Our patrol boats intercepted some of their ships, which contain endangered species. As your leader, it is my duty to uphold the laws of our country,” Aquino said in his 2012 SONA following the standoff.

“We demonstrated utmost forbearance in dealing with this issue. As a sign of our goodwill, we replaced our navy cutter with a civilian boat as soon as we could,” he said referring to the withdrawal of the BRP Gregorio del Pilar of the Navy.

FULL TEXT: State of the Nation Address 2012: Benigno Aquino III

China, however, did not leave Scarborough and continues to exercise complete control over the area and its marine resources insisting it has “indisputable sovereignty” and “historic rights” over the entire 3,500,000 square kilometers of the South China Sea.

Filipino fishermen shared numerous horror stories of being turned away by force with water cannons from both Scarborough and the Spratly islands.

After countless diplomatic protests to China, all of which were immediately rejected, the Philippine government officially filed for arbitration before the ITLOS on January 22, 2013.

“[China] has acted forcefully to assert [its “historical rights”], by exploiting the living and non-living resources in the areas beyond the UNCLOS limits while forcibly preventing other coastal States, including the Philippines, from exploiting the resources in the same areas,” Foreign Affairs secretary Albert Del Rosario said in his speech before the United Nations (UN) tribunal.

“China has pursued its activities in these disputed maritime areas with overwhelming force. The Philippines can only counter by invoking international law,” he said.

FULL TEXT: DFA chief Del Rosario’s speech at UN tribunal

Competing claims

To assert its sovereignty over the entire South China Sea, China established the nine-dash line claim which runs close to the coasts of Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, Indonesia, and the Philippines.

South-China-Sea territorial dispute China and Philippines involving spratly islands and Scarborough ShoalChina has even produced several ancient maps which it claims show that the South China Sea has been part of its territory for hundreds of years.

However, “historical rights” are not recognized under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) which is regarded as the constitution of the seas.

READ: UNCLOS explained: Why China’s claims in South China Sea are invalid

The Philippines arbitration case against China uses UNCLOS as the basis for challenging the nine-dash line claim.

Under UNCLOS, islands owned by a coastal state are entitled to a 200-nautical mile Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and a 12-nautical mile (nm) territorial sea from the baseline of their coast.

Scarborough shoal is approximately 120 nm off the coast of Zambales.

Maritime features in the Spratly Islands are Mischief Reef (130 nm off the coast of Palawan), Kennan Reef (180 nm), Gaven Reef (205 nm), Subi Reef (230nm), Johnson reef (180 nm), Cuarteron reef (240nm), and Fiery Cross reef (255 nm).

Philippine delegation to the United Nations Arbitral Tribunal in The Hague for South China Sea case

Philippine delegation to the United Nations arbitral tribunal in The Hague. Photo from the Department of Foreign Affairs

The case before the arbitral tribunal has recently begun oral arguments despite China’s continued refusal to participate in the proceedings.

BACKSTORY: PH power team to The Hague; UN tribunal to rule first on jurisdiction

As the case slowly moved forward, China carried out massive land reclamation of the reefs turning them into artificial islands capable of hosting military structures, equipment, and personnel.

“I do not think it excessive to ask that our rights be respected, just as we respect their rights as a fellow nation in a world we need to share,” Aquino said in his 2012 SONA.

“There are those who say that we should let Bajo de Masinloc go; we should avoid the trouble. But if someone entered your yard and told you he owned it, would you agree? Would it be right to give away that which is rightfully ours? And so I ask for solidarity from our people regarding this issue. Let us speak with one voice,” he said.

RELATED STORIES:

Maritime affairs expert separates facts from fiction on Scarborough Shoal

China: PH tarnishing Beijing’s international image

PH in The Hague: China violated int’l law

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

RELATED VIDEOS

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: arbitration, Benigno Aquino, China, Foreign affairs, ITLOS, maritime dispute, Philippines, Scarborough Shoal, Sona 2015, sona primer, South China Sea, Spratly Islands, territorial dispute, Unclos, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.