DND maintains Edca constitutional | Global News

DND maintains Edca constitutional

By: - Reporter / @BLozadaINQ
/ 05:13 PM May 26, 2014

MANILA, Philippines — After two former senators marched to the Supreme Court Monday morning demanding that the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement be declared unconstitutional, the Department of National Defense fired back and stood its ground.

DND spokesman Peter Galvez maintained the constitutionality of Edca, saying that it falls within the bylaws of the 1987 Constitution.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We maintain that it’s within the constitution and existing laws,” Galvez said.

FEATURED STORIES

Former senators Rene Saguisag and Wigberto Tañada led several other petitioners in asking the high court to issue a restraining order against the implementation of Edca.

“We respect their initiative,” Galvez said. “Nonetheless, we hope they will see the merits and bigger picture on how the Edca will impact our country.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Galvez added that the “country’s interest has been paramount” during the ratification of Edca.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We will be cooperating in whatever hearing will be required.”

Article continues after this advertisement

RELATED STORIES

Former senators ask SC to declare Edca unconstitutional

Article continues after this advertisement

Edca a deterrent to war—Bautista

DND: Edca not treaty, needs no Senate OK

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Constitution, Department of National Defense, EDCA, Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement, Global Nation, Peter Galvez

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.