1 in 8 California high school students has dropped out since 2010

PALO ALTO, California — Of the California students who entered high school in 2010, 12 percent, or one in every eight, dropped out before graduation, according to the most recent figures available on kidsdata.org of the Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health.

Twelve percent is high, but dropout rates among students from some racial/ethnic backgrounds are even higher.

Rates among African American and American Indian students are nearly double the state average—at about 20 percent, or one in five students, according to 2014 data.

Latino and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander students, as well as English learners, youth in foster care and special education students, also have high rates of non-completion.

Research shows that students who drop out of high school are more likely to struggle with employment, live in poverty, have poor health and engage in criminal activity than those with higher education levels.

Society also faces associated costs in terms of increased spending on public assistance and lower tax revenues. In California, students dropping out of high school cost the state an estimated $46 billion annually.

Students don’t finish high school for a variety of reasons. Risk factors include behavioral problems, suspension and course failure. Underlying causes for these factors may be related to chronic health or mental health conditions, poverty and other issues.

Children at risk of poor educational outcomes can be identified early and supported to stay engaged in school. School-based health services can address student health issues and promote social and emotional skills, according to researchers.

Policymakers also can ensure effective implementation of California’s Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF). Signed into law in 2013, LCFF moved decision-making power over K-12 spending from the state to the school districts.

LCFF allocates additional funding to districts serving students with increased educational needs, such as low-income, English learner and foster youth students.

Researchers also recommend avoiding a “zero tolerance” school discipline approach and instead suggest implementing discipline policies that are non-punitive, transparent, fair, consistent and aim to keep students in school when possible.

Like us on Facebook