PH calls on China to clarify new sea rules | Global News

PH calls on China to clarify new sea rules

By: - NewsLab Lead / @MSantosINQ
/ 03:44 PM January 10, 2014

DFA spokesman Assistant Secretary Raul Hernandez INQUIRER.net FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines — The Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) has called on China to clarify its new fisheries law issued by the Hainan province, saying it is “a gross violation of international law.”

“We have requested China to immediately clarify the new fisheries law issued by the Hainan People’s Congress,” DFA spokesman Raul Hernandez said in a press conference Friday.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We are gravely concerned by this new regulation that would require foreign fishing vessels to obtain approval from Chinese regional authorities before fishing or surveying in a large portion of the South China Sea,” he said.

FEATURED STORIES

The new law was passed late November 2013 and took effect January of 2014.

China also established a controversial Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) over the East China Sea last November that caused Japan to protest because it covered islands disputed by the two parties.

Article continues after this advertisement

“This development escalates tensions, unnecessarily complicates the situation in the South China Sea, and threatens tha peace and stability of the region,” Hernandez said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“This new law reinforces China’s expansive claim under the 9-dash line. It is a gross violation of international law, particularly UNCLOS, and is contrary to the spirit of the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

UNCLOS refers to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea which is an international agreement defining the rights responsibility of countries to the seas.

China claims the entirety of the South China sea including part of the Philippines 200-nautical mile exclusive economic zone that covers Bajo de Masinloc (Panatag Shoal or Scarborough shoal) and Ayungin shoal in the Spratlys Group of Islands.

Article continues after this advertisement

A fishing boat sails past the Meiji reef off the island province of Hainan in the West Philippine Sea in this photo taken on July 20. AP

Several Southeast Asian countries including Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan, also have territorial claims in the resource rich waters believed to also have large reserves of oil and natural gas.

The Philippines has filed a case against China before the United Nations arbitral tribunal January 2013. China has refused to participate in the case insisting on bilateral talks.

“The Philippines is not the only country adversely affected by these regulations. These regulations seriously violate the freedom of navigation and the right to fish of all states in the high seas, as provided for under UNCLOS,” Hernandez said.

“Under customary international law, no state can subject the high seas to its sovereignty,” he said.

Asked whether this new development can be used in the Philippines’ arbitration case against China, Hernandez said, “It’s up to the legal counsel to include what they want to include in order to argue our case.”

The Philippines is set to submit its written arguments on March 2014.

Related stories:

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

China fisheries law difficult to implement—Kalayaan mayor

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: China, Department of Foreign Affairs, DFA, Foreign affairs, Philippines, South China Sea, territorial dispute, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.