Locsin on China EEZ intrusions: OK, no fishing then…can we move on?
MANILA, Philippines — “Okay, no fishing then. Now, can we move on?”
Foreign Affairs Secretary Teodoro Locsin Jr. said this on Twitter on Thursday in an effort to put end to issues surrounding President Rodrigo Duterte’s pronouncement allowing China to fish in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of the Philippines.
“The fish are bored with the subject,” his tweet further read.
Okay, no fishing then. Period. Now can we move on? The fish are bored with the subject. https://t.co/3J6IQ2Sidy
— Teddy Locsin Jr. (@teddyboylocsin) June 27, 2019
The foreign affairs chief was responding to a Twitter user who said the resources within the country’s EEZ are “exclusively for Filipino citizens” as provided in the Philippine Constitution.
Article continues after this advertisementThe President, in a speech earlier this week, said he had an agreement with Chinese President Xi Jinping to allow China to fish in the Philippines’ EEZ after Beijing granted Filipino fishermen access to Scarborough Shoal.
Article continues after this advertisementREAD: Duterte: China can fish in Philippines’ EEZ
Duterte’s statement sparked an uproar, with lawmakers and maritime experts saying that allowing China to fish in Philippine territorial waters violates the Constitution.
Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio said that under the 1987 Constitution, “[t]he State shall protect the nation’s marine wealth in its archipelagic waters, territorial sea, and exclusive economic zone, and reserve its use and enjoyment exclusively to Filipino citizens.”
READ: Carpio: Letting Chinese fish in EEZ violates Constitution
But Presidential Spokesperson Salvador Panelo, who also serves as the President’s chief legal counsel, defended Duterte’s remarks.
Panelo said the President was referring to China’s historic rights claim to nearly the entire South China Sea when he said China would not let its fishermen be barred from Philippine waters.
READ: Letting Chinese fish in PH waters hit as illegal
However, a 2016 ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) at The Hague in The Netherlands invalidated China’s nine-dash line claim./ac
For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.