Carpio: Duterte affirms arbitration award in recent PH-Japan declaration | Global News

Carpio: Duterte affirms arbitration award in recent PH-Japan declaration

/ 07:13 PM November 18, 2018

carpio

Acting Chief Justice Antonio Carpio (CDN FILE PHOTO/JUNJIE MENDOZA)

President Rodrigo Duterte’s declaration of commitment to freedom of navigation in the disputed South China Sea in the joint Philippines-Japan declaration last week is an affirmation of the 2016 arbitration award, Acting Chief Justice Antonio Carpio said Sunday.

The acting chief justice, one of the leading figures in the Philippines’ arbitration victory against China, lauded the President for his support to freedom of navigation and said this was the “most welcome development in resolving the South China Sea dispute.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“The statement of President Duterte upholding freedom of navigation and overflight in the South China Sea should be the main thrust of our foreign policy in the South China Sea. The Philippines should thus encourage all states to conduct freedom of navigation and overflight exercises in the South China Sea,” Carpio said in a statement.

FEATURED STORIES

China claims nearly the entire South China Sea, including waters within the exclusive economic zones of Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, Vietnam, and Taiwan.

In July 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague invalidated China’s sweeping claims in the South China Sea. But Mr. Duterte has downplayed the victory of the Philippines in favor of economic investments from China.

Article continues after this advertisement

Economic deals and a possible framework agreement on joint exploration between the Philippines and China are expected to be signed when Chinese President Xi Jinping visits Manila this week.

Article continues after this advertisement

On the sidelines of the Asean Summit last week, Duterte met with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, where both leaders expressed “commitment to uphold the principles of freedom of navigation and overflight, freedom of commerce and other lawful activities, exercise of self-restraint, and the peaceful resolution of disputes.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“In effect, when states exercise freedom of navigation or overflight in the West Philippine Sea, they affirm the ruling of the arbitral tribunal that the Philippines has a full 200 nautical miles exclusive economic zone in the West Philippine Sea,” Carpio said.

The United States and other powerful countries have been sailing both on the high seas and EEZs in the South China Sea to assert freedom of navigation in the hotly contested waterway.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Freedom of navigation and overflight means all ships can sail in, and all aircraft can fly over, the high seas and exclusive economic zones of the South China Sea without securing the consent of, or giving prior notification to, the coastal states,” the acting top magistrate said.

“When states exercise freedom of navigation or overflight in the South China Sea, they assert that there are high seas in the center of the South China Sea, and exclusive economic zones around such high seas,” he added.

Carpio’s statement comes days after he countered the President for his remark that China “is already in possession” of the South China Sea.

“China is in physical possession of the entire Paracels, 7 geologic features in the Spratlys, and Scarborough Shoal. These geologic features, and their territorial seas, constitute less than 8 percent of the total area of the South China Sea,” Carpio said last Friday.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“Factually, China is not in possession of the South China Sea.” /je

TAGS: arbitration award, Asia, Carpio, Duterte, Features, freedom of navigation, Maritime, South China Sea, Territory

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.