Senate concurs with PH ratification of Arms Trade Treaty | Global News

Senate concurs with PH ratification of Arms Trade Treaty

/ 03:55 PM January 26, 2022

The Senate on Wednesday concurred in the ratification of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT).

The Senate building at the GSIS Complex in Pasay City. (Photo by LYN RILLON / Philippine Daily Inquirer)

MANILA, Philippines — The Senate on Wednesday concurred in the ratification of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT).

With 16 “yes” votes, no negative votes, and six abstentions, the Senate approved on third reading Senate Resolution No. 960, concurring in the Philippines’ ratification of the treaty.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Philippines signed the ATT on September 25, 2013.

FEATURED STORIES

So far there are 110 state parties to the ATT, 31 signatories, and 51 states which have yet to join the treaty.

The 1987 Constitution requires concurrence by at least two-thirds of the 24-member Senate before any international agreement that the Philippines signs become binding.

Article continues after this advertisement

The treaty regulates international trade in conventional arms by establishing the “highest international standards.” It also seeks to “prevent and eradicate illicit trade and diversion of conventional arms.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Article 6 of the treaty “unequivocally” prohibits state parties to authorize any arms sales “if it has knowledge at the time of authorization that the items would be used in the commission of genocide, crimes against humanity, or certain war crimes.”

Article continues after this advertisement

RELATED STORY:

Sen. Marcos wary of arms treaty, officials allay fear of blacklisting vs PH

JPV
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Arms Trade Treaty, AT&T, Ratification, Senate

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.