Locsin tells Roque: Drop the subject, leave foreign affairs to me | Global News

Locsin tells Roque: Drop the subject, leave foreign affairs to me

/ 01:12 AM May 12, 2021

Treaty vs nukes to bolster PH claim in West PH Sea, says Tolentino

Map showing the disputed areas in the West Philippine Sea (South China Sea), including the Spratlys Islands and Scarborough Shoal. (Image from AFP)

MANILA, Philippines — “There is only one voice on what’s ours: mine. Period.”

Foreign Affairs Secretary Teodoro Locsin Jr. said this in reaction to presidential spokesperson Harry Roque’s claim that the Julian Felipe Reef is not part of the country’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ).

Article continues after this advertisement

“There is only one voice on what’s ours: mine. Period. Not even the military has any say. I speak for the President on this subject,” Locsin said on Twitter Tuesday night.

FEATURED STORIES

In another tweet, Manila’s top diplomat also told the Palace spokesman to “drop the subject and leave it entirely to the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) under ME, the only expert on the subject bar none.”

Locsin’s post, this time, was in reaction to Roque’s response when asked in a Palace briefing earlier Tuesday on China’s continued militarization in the West Philippine Sea.

Article continues after this advertisement

“I’ve known China since 1967; [Philippine Ambassador to China] Chito Sta. [Romana] along with me. Even the military has nothing to do with foreign affairs,” Locsin’s tweet further read.

Article continues after this advertisement

‘Never’ in PH possession

Earlier Tuesday, Roque downplayed the parking of Chinese vessels at Julian Felipe Reef, saying the issue was merely “bloated” because area had “never” been in the possession of the Philippines.

Article continues after this advertisement

According to Roque, the reef is not even in the country’s EEZ, but the lingering presence of Chinese vessels there was the subject of numerous diplomatic protests recently lodged by the DFA.

Nevertheless, the Palace official said it would be in the country’s interest to “pursue our claim” in the reef.

Article continues after this advertisement

“While Julian Felipe Reef is not within our Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) because it forms part of the territorial sea of McKennan which we claim in accordance with the Marcos Presidential Decree, it is in our country’s interest to continuously pursue our claim through diplomacy or in the future by submitting it to the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice,” Roque said in a separate statement.

Julian Felipe Reef is about 175 nautical miles west of Bataraza, Palawan, well within the 200-nautical mile EEZ rule according to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

This was not the first time Locsin called out Roque for making statements on the country’s foreign policy. Back in February, Locsin told Roque back in February to “just lay off” foreign affairs.

Roque denied, however, that he was “intruding.”

He added that it would be hard to stay mum when he was speaking for President Rodrigo Duterte, whom he described as the “chief architect” of the country’s foreign policy.

RELATED STORY

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Locsin’s last warning: DFA ‘has exclusive remit’ on PH foreign affairs

[atm]

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: Foreign affairs, Foreign Policy, Harry Roque, Julian Felipe Reef, maritime dispute, PH-China Relations, Teodoro Locsin Jr., West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.