Locsin: Beijing sought limits on foreign forces at sea | Global News
CHINA-ASEAN TALKS

Locsin: Beijing sought limits on foreign forces at sea

/ 05:36 AM September 12, 2019

MANILA, Philippines — Foreign Secretary Teodoro Locsin Jr. said on Wednesday that China has sought to restrict the presence of foreign military powers in the South China Sea and foreign involvement in oil and gas projects in the disputed region under a pact it is negotiating with Southeast Asian nations.

Locsin said in a television interview, however, that China has eased up on those demands, removing potential obstacles in the conclusion of the so-called code of conduct that it’s negotiating with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean).

China and the 10-nation Asean bloc have been negotiating the nonaggression pact in an effort to deter aggressive acts by Beijing and other claimant states that could spark a major armed confrontation in the disputed territories, which straddle some of the world’s busiest sea lanes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Asean and China have agreed to keep the negotiations confidential, although China’s insistence that the proposed code should restrict foreign military presence and exercises in the disputed region has leaked out and been reported by some media outlets.

FEATURED STORIES

At least two Southeast Asian diplomats have confirmed those Chinese demands to The Associated Press (AP).

When asked about the code in his television interview, Locsin said the negotiations had been “very contentious for a while,” with China insisting that no “foreign military power should be having military presence in the South China Sea” and if “you want to develop oil and gas, they’ll only be with us.”

“The reports we’re getting now, is this, China is mellowing. It’s no longer insisting on the exclusion of foreign powers. It’s no longer insisting on this and that,” Locsin said. “So I brought this basically to, you know, the enemies of China and some of our allies.”

There was no immediate comment from Chinese government officials.

China has been accused of delaying the start of negotiations for such a regional pact for years.

Forward bases

ADVERTISEMENT

Critics say it only agreed to commence formal talks with Asean after Beijing completed building seven artificial islands in the Spratlys, the most contested area in the South China Sea.

The proposed code could have potentially restrained China from undertaking such major constructions in the disputed waters, the critics say.

Four Asean member states — Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines and Vietnam — along with China and Taiwan, have been locked in the long-simmering disputes, which escalated when China turned seven disputed reefs into islands that could serve as forward bases to project China’s military might against rival states.

Opponents have played down the significance of the code, saying China would never sign an accord that would undermine its interests.

But Locsin said China’s easing up on some of its demands showed that “there is a prospect of a fair, just and objective code of conduct in the South China Sea.”

President Rodrigo Duterte has told his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, that completion of the code should be hastened amid tensions among rival claimants, Locsin said.

The President “told him, ‘This [code of conduct] is taking forever. Can we rush this? Let’s get this out of the way so that we can avoid all of these tensions and we know who’s right, who’s wrong when something happens,’” Locsin said. “Xi Jinping said, ‘Well, why not?’”

Xi has expressed hopes the regional code could be completed in three years.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Chinese and Asean officials recently said they had completed the first of three expected rounds of negotiations.

TAGS: maritime dispute, PH-China Relations, South China Sea, Teodoro Locsin Jr., West Philippine Sea

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.