Carpio to Chinese shipowner: ‘Reed Bank not part of Spratlys’ | Global News
APOLOGY LETTER FOR SINKING OF PH FISHING BOAT

Carpio corrects Chinese shipowner: ‘Reed Bank not part of Spratly Islands’

/ 06:32 PM August 28, 2019

Pursue fishery cooperation in South China Sea, claimants urged

MANILA, Philippines — “An accidental collision between a Chinese and a Philippine fishing boat in the waters of Reed Bank, Nansha Island Group on the evening of 9 June, caused damage to a Philippine boat.”

This was an excerpt taken from the translated apology letter released by a certain “Association” on behalf of the owner of the Chinese ship involved in an allision with a Filipino vessel in Reed Bank (Recto Bank) last June.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Two months later, Chinese shipowner apologizes for ‘accident’ with PH boat

FEATURED STORIES

But Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio on Wednesday corrected the same letter, saying that Reed Bank, is not a part of Nansha Island Group — more commonly known as Spratly Islands.

“Reed Bank is not part of the Spratly Islands. Only China claims Reed Bank is part of the Spratly Islands (Nansha to China),” Carpio said in a statement.

Article continues after this advertisement

Carpio explained that the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague ruled that “Reed Bank is a completely submerged area, forming part of Philippine EEZ (exclusive economic zone), beyond the territorial sea of any island in the Spratlys.”

Article continues after this advertisement

According to the apology letter, the Association explained that the shipowner is one of their members and that the shipowner “would like to express his sincere apology to the Filipino fishermen.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“The Philippine side is requested to file a specific appeal for civil compensation based on the actual loss,” the letter reads.

“Our Association will urge the shipowner of the fishing boat involved to actively coordinate with the Philippine side to expedite the latter’s claim for compensation according to the procedures for insurance claims,” it added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Against the Constitution

Carpio had previously noted that allowing Chinese fishermen to fish within the country’s EEZ is against the Constitution.

Quoting the 1987 Constitution, Carpio said in an earlier statement: “The State shall protect the nation’s marine wealth in its … exclusive economic zone, and reserve its use and enjoyment exclusively to Filipino citizens.”

Carpio said explained that this means that “the Philippine Government cannot allow Chinese fishermen to fish in our EEZ in the West Philippine Sea. This also means that the ‘use and enjoyment’ of the fish in our EEZ is reserved exclusively to Filipinos.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

READ: Carpio: Letting Chinese fish in EEZ violates Constitution

/atm

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: Antonio Carpio, maritime dispute, Recto Bank, Reed Bank, Spratly Islands, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.