China could seize Reed Bank if PH can’t pay loans | Global News

China could seize gas in Reed Bank if PH can’t pay loans – Carpio

/ 01:16 PM March 24, 2019

The map shows disputed claims in the South China Sea. It includes locations for Reed Bank and Benham Rise, where Chinese survey ships were seen last year, according to the Philippine government. AFP FILE

MANILA, Philippines — The Philippines should be wary about the Chico River Pump Irrigation Loan Agreement because it could potentially allow China to take the gas-rich Reed Bank (Recto Bank) in the West Philippine Sea if it is unable to pay the $62-million loan, Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio warned.

“In case of default by the Philippines in repayment of the loan, China can seize, to satisfy any arbitral award in favor of China, ‘patrimonial assets and assets dedicated to commercial use’ of the Philippine government,” the senior magistrate said.

Article continues after this advertisement

The deal, said to be the first flagship infrastructure project to be financed by China under the administration’s Build, Build, Build program, was signed in April 2018.

FEATURED STORIES

In his presentation at the Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila on Friday, Carpio showed parts of the agreement, “which is expected to be the template for all other Chinese loans to the Philippines.”

Under paragraph 8.1 of the Loan Agreement, the Philippines expressly waived immunity over all its assets except those used properties of Philippine embassies and missions; those under Philippine military control; and those assets for “public or governmental use as distinguished from patrimonial assets and assets dedicated to commercial use.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The rich gas field in Reed Bank falls under the category of “patrimonial assets and assets dedicated to commercial use,” Carpio said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Seismic surveys have indicated that Reed Bank is rich in oil and gas deposits. Based on the 2016 Permanent Court of Arbitration ruling, it is within the Philippine exclusive economic zone, thus the government can explore and exploit resources there.

Article continues after this advertisement

China, which has rejected the ruling, is also claiming the Reed Bank.

Carpio warned that the loan agreement is governed by Chinese law: “In case of dispute, arbitration shall be conducted by the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) under CIETAC arbitration rules.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The award of CIETAC is final and binding. The arbitration shall be held in Beijing. The Philippines expressly waived any sovereign immunity on “the enforcement of any arbitral award,” he said.

Under CIETAC rules, “China will always have a majority in the arbitral panel,” and Carpio said the Philippines won’t have a chance of winning.

Carpio also put a spotlight on the confidentiality clause of the loan agreement, which is not in line with the Philippine Constitution that says Filipinos have the right to information and access to documents of public concern.

Early this month, government officials guaranteed that a number of agencies vetted the China loan before it was approved.

READ: DOF: China loan deal vetted vs graft

Still, Carpio cautioned that the Philippines might end up like a few countries falling into China’s debt trap.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“If the cost is bloated (there was no public bidding), and this happens to the other loans, then the Philippines may have a hard time paying,” he said. /cbb

TAGS: China, Features, Loans, Reed Bank

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.