Carpio: Out of ICC, PH helpless vs China | Global News

Carpio: Out of ICC, PH helpless vs China

/ 05:30 AM October 10, 2018

Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio warned that the Philippines would be giving up a “very strong” legal deterrent against a possible China invasion of the West Philippine Sea if it withdrew from the International Criminal Court (ICC).

At the last round of oral arguments on Tuesday, Carpio listed the implications of President Rodrigo Duterte’s order in March to pull out from the international treaty creating the ICC on the maritime dispute with China.

Carpio told Solicitor General Jose Calida in open court that the Philippines could sue China’s leaders, led by President Xi Jinping, at the ICC for alleged crimes against humanity should China invade Philippine-occupied Pag-asa Island or Panatag (Scarborough) Shoal.

Article continues after this advertisement

Keep hands off

FEATURED STORIES

He said such an action was tantamount to the crime of aggression, which, under the Rome Statute, fell under crimes against humanity.

“In withdrawing from the Rome Statute, we will be giving up this very strong legal deterrent,” Carpio told Calida.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We cannot sue Xi Jinping [before the ICC] if he invades Pag-asa or if he builds a military base on Scarborough Shoal” if the Philippines withdrew from the ICC, he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Calida replied he was not ready to cite other international tribunals where the Philippines could take legal action under Carpio’s scenario.

Article continues after this advertisement

In his opening statement, Calida told the justices to keep their hands off the President’s decision to pull out from the ICC claiming the issue “involved a political question and thus not subject to judicial review.”

He added that the Constitution did not explicitly state that the Senate had to concur with the President’s withdrawal from an international treaty.

Article continues after this advertisement

No violation

“The President did not violate the Constitution,” Calida said.

“What he did was to exercise his constitutional prerogative as the chief architect of the country’s foreign policy,” Calida insisted.

Opposition senators and human rights advocates had questioned the constitutionality of the President’s order to withdraw from the Rome Statute since he did not get the Senate’s approval.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Mr. Duterte gave the order in March after the ICC prosecutor began a preliminary probe into a complaint accusing him and 11 of his officials of committing crimes against humanity for the thousands of deaths in the President’s war on drugs.

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: Antonio Carpio, ICC, International Criminal Court, Jose Calida, maritime dispute, Rodrigo Duterte, Rome Statute, South China Sea, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.