Esperon: Diplomatic protest vs China over landing of bombers unnecessary | Global News

Esperon: Diplomatic protest vs China over landing of bombers unnecessary

/ 09:44 AM May 30, 2018

National Security Adviser Hermogenes Esperon explains circumstances in the South China Sea during the weekly Kapihan sa Manila Bay on May 30, 2018. (INQUIRER.net/Gab Lalu)

Should the Philippines protest China’s provocative military activities in the disputed South China Sea?

For National Security Adviser Hermogenes Esperon Jr., the filing of diplomatic protest against China for its landing of nuclear capable bombers on Woody Island was unnecessary.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The purpose has to be looked into — it is a training. Parang sinabi mong dapat mag-protest ka dahil nag-train sila,” Esperon said during the weekly Kapihan sa Manila Bay forum.

FEATURED STORIES

He stressed that Woody Island, which was occupied by China since 1974, is not within the exclusive economic zone of the Philippines.

“Are we the target? I don’t think so because we are not at war with China. We are not at war with the ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations),” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“So shall we lodge a protest for that? Sa tingin ko hindi,” he added.  /kga

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: Hermogenes Esperon, Permanent Court of Arbitration, South China Sea, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.