China claims right to air defense zone, denounces court | Global News

China claims right to air defense zone, denounces court

/ 02:13 PM July 13, 2016

China's Vice Foreign Minister Liu Zhenmin looks at the white policy paper on South China Sea during a press briefing at the State Council Information Office in Beijing, Wednesday, July 13, 2016. China blamed the Philippines for stirring up trouble and issued a policy paper Wednesday calling the islands in the South China Sea its "inherent territory," a day after an international tribunal said China had no legal basis for its expansive claims. AP PHOTO

China’s Vice Foreign Minister Liu Zhenmin looks at the white policy paper on South China Sea during a press briefing at the State Council Information Office in Beijing, Wednesday, July 13, 2016. China blamed the Philippines for stirring up trouble and issued a policy paper Wednesday calling the islands in the South China Sea its “inherent territory,” a day after an international tribunal said China had no legal basis for its expansive claims. AP PHOTO

BEIJING—Beijing “has the right” to declare an air defense identification zone over the South China Sea, it said Wednesday as it stepped up denunciations of an international tribunal that ruled against its expansive claims in the strategic waters.

Whether Beijing set up such a zone — which would require civilian aircraft to identify themselves to military controllers — depended on “the level of threat we receive”, said vice foreign minister Liu Zhenmin.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Do not turn the South China Sea into a cradle of war,” he told reporters, insisting: “China’s aim is to turn the South China Sea into a sea of piece, friendship and cooperation”.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Angry China warns of sea conflict

China reasserted its claims to the area, which extend almost to the coasts of neighboring states, after the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) tribunal in The Hague backed the Philippines’ case that there was no legal basis for them.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Philippines wins arbitration case vs. China over South China Sea

Article continues after this advertisement

Liu described the ruling as “a piece of waste paper” at a press conference, alleging the tribunal had been “manipulated”.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: China rejects ruling on South China Sea as ‘null and void’

The five judges who ruled in the case “made money from the Philippines”, Liu said, adding “and maybe other people gave them money too”.

Article continues after this advertisement

He stressed that four of the judges were from EU countries, with the Ghanaian chairman a longtime resident of Europe.

“Are these kind of judges representative?” he asked rhetorically. “Do they understand Asian culture?”

A Japanese former president of the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea, Shunji Yanai, had “manipulated the entire proceedings” from behind the scenes, he alleged.

Yanai, a former Japanese ambassador to South Korea and the US, stepped down from his role in 2014.

Beijing boycotted the PCA proceedings, saying the court had no jurisdiction to rule on the issues, and has mounted a huge diplomatic and publicity drive to try to discredit the tribunal and its decision.

Liu was speaking at the launch of a government white paper on the issue.

China was “the first to have discovered, named, and explored and exploited” islands in the sea and their surrounding waters, the document said.

It was in direct contradiction to the ruling in The Hague on Tuesday, which said that “there was no evidence that China had historically exercised exclusive control over the waters or their resources”.

The UN-backed tribunal also said that any “historic rights” to resources in the waters of the South China Sea were “extinguished” when China signed up to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

As such, it said there was “no legal basis” for China to claim historic rights to resources within its so-called nine-dash line demarcating its territorial claims.

China had no possible entitlement to areas within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone, it added.

“I hope you put this decision in the wastepaper basket, or on the bookshelf, or filing cabinet and keep it there,” Liu told reporters.

He also called for renewed dialogue with the Philippines — on the basis of recognition of China’s historical claims.

‘All measures necessary’

Chinese state-run media on Wednesday denounced the ruling as biased and invalid and urged Beijing to “safeguard” China’s territorial sovereignty.

The People’s Daily, the ruling Communist Party’s mouthpiece, branded the award and the request by the former Philippine administration of Benigno Aquino III to set up the tribunal as being “manipulated and instigated by external forces”.

It added Beijing will “take all measures necessary” to protect its sovereignty and rights.

The English-language China Daily blasted the tribunal’s award as “outrageously one-sided” and “inherently biased, unjust, and thus not executable”.

“Beijing certainly should, and has to, ready itself for worst-case scenarios, including potential military collisions,” it said.

At the briefing, Liu said that “Chinese navy ships operating in the South China Sea is normal, because it is our sea”.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

RELATED VIDEOS

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: air defense zone, China, Permanent Court of Arbitration, Philippines, sea row, South China Sea, territorial dispute, United Nations, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.