US: South China Sea ruling 'legally binding' | Global News

US: South China Sea ruling ‘legally binding’

/ 09:24 AM July 13, 2016

Protesters stand outside the Peace Palace in The Hague, Netherlands, on Tuesday, July 12, 2016, ahead of a ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) on the dispute between China and the Philippines over the South China Sea. China has intensified the drumbeat of its opposition to an international tribunal's ruling expected Tuesday that could threaten its expansive claims in the South China Sea. AP PHOTO

Protesters stand outside the Peace Palace in The Hague, Netherlands, on Tuesday, July 12, 2016, ahead of a ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) on the dispute between China and the Philippines over the South China Sea. China has intensified the drumbeat of its opposition to an international tribunal’s ruling expected Tuesday that could threaten its expansive claims in the South China Sea. AP PHOTO

WASHINGTON—The United States put itself on a collision course with great power rival China on Tuesday, describing a ruling against Beijing’s South China Sea claims as “final and legally binding.”

Washington had carefully avoided taking a stance on the suit lodged by the Philippines against China’s maritime territorial claims, but when judgment came down, it urged both sides to abide by the result.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: US urges all parties to respect verdict on South China Sea row

FEATURED STORIES

“The United States expresses its hope and expectation that both parties will comply with their obligations,” State Department spokesman John Kirby said. Beijing has already rejected the ruling out of hand.

Earlier, a UN-backed tribunal in The Hague — the Permanent Court of Arbitration — ruled that China has no historic rights to resources within the sea areas falling within the so-called “nine-dash-line”.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Philippines wins arbitration case vs. China over South China Sea

Article continues after this advertisement

The United States has no claims of its own within this three-million-square-kilometer (1.2-million-square-mile) patch of sea, but has asserted the right of all shipping to pass through areas it regards as international waters.

Article continues after this advertisement

And Washington is an ally of the Southeast Asian countries which do dispute China’s claim, including the Philippines, which lodged the international suit.

“The decision today by the tribunal in the Philippines-China arbitration is an important contribution to the shared goal of a peaceful resolution to disputes in the South China Sea,” Kirby said.

Article continues after this advertisement

US officials are “studying the decision and have no comment on the merits of the case,” he added, but nevertheless asserted the right of the tribunal to make its ruling and said it should be respected.

“The United States strongly supports the rule of law. We support efforts to resolve territorial and maritime disputes in the South China Sea peacefully, including through arbitration,” he said.

“As provided in the Convention, the tribunal’s decision is final and legally binding on both China and the Philippines,” he added, urging all claimants “to avoid provocative statements or actions.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

But Beijing had already reacted furiously, saying it “neither accepts nor recognizes” the ruling.

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: arbitration, China, jurisdiction, Maritime, Philippines, rule of law, sea row, South China Sea, territorial dispute, UN, Unclos, United Nations, United States, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.