China violated Philippine sovereign rights in West Philippine Sea | Global News
Arbitral Tribunal verdict

China violated Philippine sovereign rights in West Philippine Sea

By: - NewsLab Lead / @MSantosINQ
/ 07:09 PM July 12, 2016

South China Sea Ruling arbitral tribunal maritime dispute philippines china

In this July 7, 2015, image provided by the Permanent Court of Arbitration, the case regarding the Philippines and China on the South China Sea is heard at the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) at The Hague, the Netherlands. An arbitration panel in The Hague, Netherlands, will issue a ruling Tuesday, July 12, 2016, in a long-running dispute between the Philippines and China over the South China Sea. The Philippines has asked the tribunal to declare China’s claims and actions invalid under the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea. Beijing has refused to join the case, rejecting the tribunal’s jurisdiction, and says it will not accept the decision.(Permanent Court of Arbitration via AP)

The international arbitral tribunal has concluded that China has violated Philippines sovereign rights in the West Philippine Sea by preventing Filipinos from fishing there and by constructing artificial islands.

BACKSTORY: Philippines wins arbitration case vs. China over South China Sea

Article continues after this advertisement

“The tribunal concluded that China had violated the Philippines’ sovereign rights with respect to its exclusive economic zone and continental shelf,” the tribunal said in its decision released on Tuesday.

FEATURED STORIES

“The tribunal found as a matter of fact that China had

(a) interfered with Philippine petroleum exploration at Reed Bank,

Article continues after this advertisement

(b) purported to prohibit fishing by Philippine vessels within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone,

Article continues after this advertisement

(c) protected and failed to prevent Chinese fishermen from fishing within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone at Mischief Reef and Second Thomas Shoal, and

Article continues after this advertisement

(d) constructed installations and artificial islands at Mischief Reef without the authorization of the Philippines.”

The tribunal also concluded that China’s actions preventing Filipino fishermen from getting to Scarborough Shoal, also known as Panatag Shoal or Bajo de Masinloc, was illegal.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Although the tribunal emphasized that it was not deciding sovereignty over Scarborough Shoal, it found that China had violated its duty to respect to the traditional fishing rights of Philippine fishermen by halting access to the shoal after May 2012,” it said.

Chinese maritime law enforcement vessels were also found to have conducted illegal and dangerous activities against Philippine ships during the 2012 Scarborough Shoal standoff.

“The tribunal found that Chinese law enforcement vessels had repeatedly approached the Philippine vessels at high speed and sought to cross ahead of them at close distances, creating serious risk of collision and danger to Philippine ships and personnel,” the tribunal said.

“The tribunal concluded that China had breached its obligations under the Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972, and Article 94 the Convention concerning maritime safety,” it added.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

RELATED STORIES:

RELATED VIDEOS

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: arbitral tribunal, arbitration, arbitration court, China, decision, ITLOS, Philippines, South China Sea, verdict, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.