Japanese judge's tribunal choices biased—China | Global News
South China Sea dispute:

Japanese judge’s tribunal choices biased—China

/ 06:12 PM July 10, 2016

Philippines arbitration case China maritime dispute arbitral tribunal

FILE PHOTO

The Japanese judge who oversaw the formation of a tribunal which is set to deliver a decision on the South China Sea has been accused by Beijing of bias.

A front-page report in Saturday’s Japan Times said China has expressed its criticism of the judge in Chinese state-run media and Op-Ed articles published in foreign newspapers over the past two months.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Perhaps most surprisingly, it (Beijing) has even alluded to a Japanese conspiracy to steer the decision away from favouring China,” the Japan Times report said.

FEATURED STORIES

When the Philippines filed the case against China in 2013, Judge Shunji Yanai was the president of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Itlos), an independent judicial body established by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea to adjudicate disputes.

Both China and the Philippines had the right to nominate one judge to a five-member arbitral tribunal that would be hosted by the Permanent Court of Arbitration and would be independent of Itlos. But China gave up this right after it refused to take part, and this was why Judge Yanai had to choose a judge on behalf of China.

Article continues after this advertisement

However, an op-ed in the Jakarta Post last month by Chinese Ambassador to Indonesia Xie Feng said the judge “went to great pains to form a temporary tribunal” that can “hardly be considered as universally representative.”

Article continues after this advertisement

In May, China’s People’s Daily published a commentary saying four of the judges – who are European – “were appointed by Shunji Yanai, a biased Japanese” former Itlos president. Chinese media also said Judge Yanai should have recused himself because Japan has a separate dispute with China in the East China Sea.

Article continues after this advertisement

Judge Yanai told the Japan Times recently that this was “completely irrelevant.”

“I just happen to be Japanese,” he said, adding that his first consideration on appointing the panel was not nationality but “the legal capabilities of the arbitrators.”

Article continues after this advertisement

RELATED STORIES

Q&A: Landmark ruling on South China Sea

UNCLOS lays down the rules for the planet’s oceans

Hague tribunal to rule in tense South China Sea row

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

RELATED VIDEOS

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: China, Foreign affairs, Global Nation, International relations, Japan, maritime dispute, Philippines, South China Sea, territorial dispute, The Hague, United Nations, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.