PH hails Hague court ruling to take up arbitration case vs China | Global News

PH hails Hague court ruling to take up arbitration case vs China

By: - Reporter / @TarraINQ
/ 10:14 AM October 30, 2015

PH Delegation The Hague

The empty table in front depicts the non-participation of China in the arbitration case filed by the Philippines, which was witnessed by international observers. PHOTO FROM ABIGAIL VALTE

The Philippines on Friday welcomed the ruling of the United Nations arbitral tribunal declaring jurisdiction over its case seeking to stop Chinese incursions in the disputed West Philippine Sea (South China Sea) and invalidate the “excessive” nine-dash line claim over the resource-rich territory.

READ: Philippines scores against China in UN arbitration

Article continues after this advertisement

In separate statements, the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) and the Office of the Solicitor General welcomed the ruling released late Thursday, where the ad hoc tribunal said it had jurisdiction over the case and would, thus, hold further proceedings on the merits.

FEATURED STORIES

“We welcome the decision of the Arbitral Tribunal that it has jurisdiction over our case. We look forward to the Tribunal’s further hearing on the merits of the case,” said Assistant Secretary Charles Jose, the DFA spokesperson.

READ: PH in The Hague: China violated int’l law | Philippines stands up to China

Article continues after this advertisement

Solicitor General Florin Hilbay, the Philippines’ agent in the arbitration proceedings, said the UN panel’s award on jurisdiction and admissibility “represents a significant step forward in the Philippines’ quest for a peaceful, impartial resolution of the disputes between the parties and the clarification of their rights under UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea).”

Article continues after this advertisement

“The elimination of preliminary objections to the exercise of the tribunal’s jurisdiction opens the way for the presentation of the merits of the Philippines’ substantive claims,” Hilbay said in a statement sent via text Friday morning.

Article continues after this advertisement

The tribunal’s ruling was unanimous, and held that China’s refusal to participate in the proceedings “does not deprive the Tribunal of jurisdiction.”

It said “the Philippines’ decision to commence arbitration unilaterally was not an abuse of the Convention’s dispute settlement procedures.”

Article continues after this advertisement

While China is not participating in the proceedings, the tribunal took cognizance of a position paper Beijing had released tackling the dispute.

In its initial ruling, the panel rejected China’s argument “that the Parties’ dispute is actually about
sovereignty over the islands in the South China Sea and therefore beyond the Tribunal’s jurisdiction” and that it was about maritime delimitations.

“On the contrary, the Tribunal has held that each of the Philippines’ Submissions reflect disputes between the two States concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention. The Tribunal has also held that no other States are indispensable to the proceeding,” read a statement on the ruling released by the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague, where the panel is holding court.

The Philippines initiated arbitration proceedings in 2013, following successive Chinese incursions and continuing military buildup in the disputed waters.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

RELATED VIDEOS

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: arbitration, China, DFA, Florin Hilbay, Philippines, Solicitor General, South China Sea, territorial dispute, The Hague, United Nation, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.