UN court to rule on jurisdiction on PH-China sea row | Global News

UN court to rule on jurisdiction on PH-China sea row

By: - Reporter / @NikkoDizonINQ
/ 09:29 AM July 10, 2015

hague

Members of the Philippine team are seated at the Peace Palace in The Hague before starting oral arguments on the arbitration case against China’s claims over the West Philippine Sea. Members include Solicitor General Florin Hilbay, Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio, Justice Secretary Leila de Lima, Presidential Adviser on Political Affairs Ronald Llamas, Speaker Sonny Belmonte Jr., Executive Secretary Pacquito Ochoa Jr., Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario, Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin, Associate Justice Francis Jardeleza, Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Benjamin Caguioa, Deputy Executive Secretary Menardo Guevarra, Consul General Henry Bensurto and legal counsels led by Paul Reichler of Foley Hoag. PHOTO FROM ABIGAIL VALTE’S TWITTER ACCOUNT

The five-member United Nations Arbitral Tribunal will deliberate Friday whether or not they will proceed to the second round of oral arguments on the Philippines’ petition against China over a rankling maritime row in the South China Sea.

In a dispatch from The Hague, deputy presidential spokesperson Abigail Valte said that the Arbitral Tribunal would be “convening today to deliberate on the presentations made by the Philippines in its claims against China.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“In the past two days, the Philippines presented its arguments to prove that the tribunal has jurisdiction over the matter and that there is no bar to the exercise of its jurisdiction,” Valte said.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Day 2 in The Hague: PH insists on UN court’s jurisdiction

Valte said should the tribunal decide to ask the Philippine legal team more questions, the second round of arguments would be held on July 13.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Philippines told the arbitral tribunal in the first round of arguments that China has flouted international maritime laws, using so-called “historic rights” to claim nearly 90 percent of the resource-rich South China Sea.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: PH in The Hague: China violated int’l law

Article continues after this advertisement

The UN court will first have to determine whether it has jurisdiction over the complaint filed by the Philippines against China, before it proceeds to hear the merits of the case.

Should the arbitral tribunal decide that it has no jurisdiction over the complaint, the Philippines would have to rethink its strategy on how to protect its sovereignty in the South China Sea.

Article continues after this advertisement

China has already built artificial islands, apparently military garrisons, on seven of the reefs and shoals it claims in the South China Sea, raising concerns among its regional neighbors and Washington over an increasingly changing security environment.

IN PHOTOS: China’s reclamation in West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: China, Maritime Row, Philippines, reclamation, sea row, South China Sea, territorial dispute, The Hague, UN, United Nations arbitral tribunal, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.