PH-Japan war drill unconstitutional; there’s no treaty | Global News

PH-Japan war drill unconstitutional; there’s no treaty

By: - Reporter / @deejayapINQ
/ 04:47 PM June 24, 2015

The joint military drills between the Philippines and Japan in Palawan province are unconstitutional and a violation of Philippine sovereignty, a party-list lawmaker said on Tuesday.

ACT Teachers Rep. Antonio Tinio called for a halt to the joint exercises, noting the absence of a Senate-ratified treaty with Japan allowing the presence of Japanese troops in Philippine territory.

“President Aquino is committing a gross and blatant violation of the constitutional prohibition on foreign troops in allowing the joint exercises with Japanese military forces,” Tinio said in a statement.

Article continues after this advertisement

He cited reports of a Japanese P-3C Orion reconnaissance plane taking off from an airfield in Palawan and doing surveillance flight over the disputed Recto Bank (Reed Bank) in the West Philippine Sea.

FEATURED STORIES

Under the Constitution, the presence of foreign military forces in the Philippine territory is prohibited unless authorized by a treaty ratified by the Senate, Tinio said.

No treaty with Japan

Article continues after this advertisement

“The Philippines has no existing treaty with Japan allowing the presence of their troops in our country, much less the holding of joint military exercises and conducting Japanese reconnaissance missions from Philippine installations,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Tinio said existing agreements with Japan did not fulfill the constitutional requirement of a Senate-ratified treaty and therefore could not be cited as legal basis for Japanese military activities in the Philippines.

Article continues after this advertisement

Tinio was referring to the memorandum on defense cooperation and exchanges signed by the Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin and his Japanese counterpart in January, and to the declaration for a strengthened strategic partnership signed by President Aquino and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe last month.

“By all means, our territory must be defended against Chinese encroachment in the West Philippine Sea. But this must be done without surrendering national sovereignty and within the bounds of the Constitution,” Tinio said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Japanese militarism’

He also said the President’s “endorsement” of Japanese militarism was reprehensible, considering the country’s experience under brutal Japanese occupation during World War II.

“A policy of self-reliance and neutrality is the only way for the Philippines to achieve a peaceful resolution to the South China Sea crisis,” Tinio said.

“The Aquino administration’s policy of relying on the US and Japan will only lead to further subservience, dependency, and an intensification of tensions in the region,” he said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

He said he would file a resolution calling for a House investigation of Japanese military activities in the Philippines.

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: 1987 Constitution, Antonio Tinio, Benigno Aquino III, China, constitutional law, Defense, Diplomacy, Foreign affairs, geopolitics, Global Nation, House of Representatives, International relations, Japan, joint military exercises, Law, Palawan, Philippine Congress, Philippine president, Philippines, Security, Senate, South China Sea, Spratly Islands, territorial disputes, Territories, Treaty, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.