DFA lectures China: Your reclamation, PH airstrip upgrade different | Global News

DFA lectures China: Your reclamation, PH airstrip upgrade different

By: - NewsLab Lead / @MSantosINQ
/ 05:40 PM June 19, 2014

charles-jose

DFA spokesman Charles Jose.  AP FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—The Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) lectured China on the “big difference” between the Philippines’ plan to upgrade its facilities in islands in the West Philippines Sea (South China Sea) and the reclamation work that China is doing to the reefs there.

“I would like to point out the big difference in what we are doing and what China is doing. What we are doing in our airstrip on Pag-asa island, it is the maintenance and repair work for the safety of our people there,” DFA spokesman Charles Jose said in a press conference Thursday.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We are not trying to change the nature or character of the maritime feature there. We are not doing reclamation work that could harm the environment. China, by its reclamation work that they are doing, they are trying to change the character of the maritime feature,” he said.

FEATURED STORIES

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying said in a press conference last June 16 that the Philippines was making “provocative actions” when it announced plans to upgrade facilities in the Spratly Islands.

“The Philippines’ Defense Ministry announced that they would invest large sums of money to upgrade the airstrips and naval facilities on the Zhongye Island (Pag-asa Island). In January this year, the Philippines’ military officials again announced their plans to build a world-class airport on the so-called Kalayaan Island,” she said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The Philippine side, on the one hand, intentionally takes provocative actions while on the other hand makes irresponsible remarks on China’s legitimate actions which are within China’s sovereignty. That is unjustifiable. We call on the Philippine side to correct its erroneous actions … and stop provocations that would further aggravate and complicate the situation,” Hua said.

Article continues after this advertisement

China further demanded for the Philippines to withdraw all its facilities and personnel in the Spratly islands, saying that these had been “illegally and forcefully occupied” since the 1970s.

Article continues after this advertisement

DFA previously released a series of aerial photographs showing the progression of reclamation activities conducted by China on Mabini reef.

Jose previously said that these reclaimed artificial islands are likely foundations for “military purposes.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Foreign Affairs Secretary Albert Del Rosario expressed his intent to raise before the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) the need for a moratorium on all activities in the disputed region to ease tensions.

In a separate interview, he also said that they are studying the possibility of filing a request before the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea (Itlos) to expedite the proceedings given that China has already expressed that it will not participate in the arbitration case.

RELATED STORIES

PH seeks quick ruling on suit vs China

China demands PH to withdraw from ‘illegally seized’ islands

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

PH racing against China’s reclamation in West PH Sea

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: airstrip, Charles Jose, China, DFA, Hua Chunying, Philippines, reclamation, territorial row, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.