Judge tosses New York plastic pollution lawsuit against PepsiCo
Bottles of Pepsi soda are seen on display at a Target store on February 9, 2024 in the Flatbush neighborhood of Brooklyn borough New York City. PepsiCo reported a drop in their fourth-quarter sales due the price hikes on their products that the company passed on to consumers because of higher production costs. (Photo by Michael M. Santiago / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA / Getty Images via AFP)
NEW YORK, United States — A New York Supreme Court justice has thrown out an environmental pollution lawsuit against PepsiCo, in a blow to authorities in the US state who wanted the beverage giant to rein in its use of single-use plastics.
New York Attorney General Letitia James sued the company last year, seeking a finding that it contributed to a “public nuisance” in the Buffalo River with its products.
She also sought an order that the company cease the sale of single-use plastic on goods that do not warn of their environmental ills.
A survey by James’ office found that PepsiCo’s plastic packaging was by far the greatest source of Buffalo River plastic pollution, three times as abundant as the next contributor, McDonald’s.
But Justice Emilio Colaiavoco sided with Pepsi in dismissing the case Thursday, saying that allegations were “speculative” and said that it was individual consumers, not the company, responsible for littering and polluting waterways.
Article continues after this advertisement“While I can think of no reasonable person who does not believe in the imperatives of recycling and being better stewards of our environment, this does not give rise to phantom assertions of liability,” he wrote.
Article continues after this advertisement“Absent the (state) legislature passing a law or the executive branch issuing an order establishing such a theory of liability or imposing restrictions on what type and amount of plastic can be used, this lawsuit is simply policy idealism.”
PepsiCo said in a statement that it was pleased with the ruling and that it “remains serious about plastic reduction and effective recycling.”
The attorney general’s office for its part said it would review its options, adding it remains “committed to protecting communities from the dangers of plastic pollution.”
The lawsuit pointed out that plastics “cause wide-ranging harms to the public and New York State,” highlighting the presence of microplastics in both humans and fish.
Health-related problems “include early puberty in females, reduced sperm counts, altered functions of reproductive organs, obesity, altered sex-specific behaviors, and increased rates of some kinds of cancers,” the suit said.
The lawsuit acknowledged company statements pledging action to reduce plastic pollution but depicts PepsiCo, headquartered in New York state, as repeatedly falling short of pledges.
Further, the suit argued PepsiCo had not produced alternatives to single-use plastics to any significant degree in the New York market.
In contrast, PepsiCo has announced reusable glass and plastic programs in international markets including Mexico and Germany.
