China urged to act vs Japan overflights | Global News

China urged to act vs Japan overflights

/ 01:41 PM November 29, 2013

A visitor stands before a decommissioned Chinese A-5 Ground Attack aircraft at the Military Museum in Beijing on November 28, 2013. Japan and South Korea said they have defied China’s newly declared air defence zone with military overflights, showing Beijing a united front after US B-52 bombers did the same. Meanwhile Chinese authorities are coming under domestic pressure to toughen their response to incursions into the air defence identification zone (ADIZ) they declared last weekend. AFP PHOTO / Ed Jones

BEIJING – China’s state media called Friday for “timely countermeasures without hesitation” if Japan violates the country’s newly declared air zone, after Beijing sent fighter jets to patrol the area following defiant military overflights by Tokyo.

Japan and South Korea both said Thursday they had disregarded the air defense identification zone (ADIZ) that Beijing declared last weekend, showing a united front after US B-52 bombers also entered the area.

Article continues after this advertisement

The zone includes disputed islands claimed by China, which knows them as the Diaoyus, but controlled by Japan, which calls them the Senkakus, and Beijing’s ADIZ was condemned in Washington, Tokyo, South Korea and elsewhere.

FEATURED STORIES

China sent fighter jets and an early warning aircraft into the area Thursday, the official Xinhua news agency reported after Tokyo said its military and coastguard had both flown through it.

Washington has security alliances with both Tokyo and Seoul, and analysts say that neither China nor Japan — the world’s second- and third-biggest economies, and major trading partners of each other — want to engage in armed conflict.

Article continues after this advertisement

But Beijing is facing mounting internal pressure to assert itself.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Global Times newspaper, which often takes a nationalistic tone, said in an editorial Friday: “We should carry out timely countermeasures without hesitation against Japan when it challenges China’s newly declared ADIZ.

Article continues after this advertisement

“If Tokyo flies its aircraft over the zone, we will be bound to send our plane to its ADIZ.”

The paper, which is close to China’s ruling Communist party, said: “If the trend continues, there will likely be frictions and confrontations and even tension in the air like in the Cold War era between the US and the Soviet Union. We are willing to engage in a protracted confrontation with Japan.”

Article continues after this advertisement

But it shied away from threatening Washington, which sent giant Stratofortress bombers inside the zone, issuing a message.

“If the US does not go too far, we will not target it in safeguarding our air defense zone,” the paper said, adding that Australia could be “ignored” and that South Korea “understands” as it has tensions of its own with Japan.

China’s Communist Party seeks to bolster its public support by tapping into deep-seated resentment of Japan for its brutal invasion of the country in the 1930s.

The media rhetoric came after Chinese planes conducted air patrols on Thursday as “a defensive measure and in line with international common practices”, Xinhua quoted People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force spokesman Shen Jinke as saying.

China first sent fighters, scouts and early warning aircraft into the zone on Saturday, Xinhua reported earlier, and the East Sea Fleet’s air arm has also been flying in the area, according to state broadcaster CCTV.

The Chinese ADIZ requires aircraft to provide their flight plan, declare their nationality and maintain two-way radio communication — or face unspecified “defensive emergency measures”.

Both Japan and Washington have ADIZs of their own, and China accuses them of double standards, saying the real provocateur is Tokyo.

Defense ministry spokesman Yang Yujun said Thursday that Japan established its ADIZ in 1969, so Tokyo had “no right to make irresponsible remarks” about China’s.

“If there are to be demands for a withdrawal, then we invite the Japanese side to first withdraw its air defense identification zone, and China may reconsider after 44 years,” he said.

Tokyo denies that there is a dispute over the islands, and Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga declined Friday to be drawn on reports that a Chinese envoy had suggested setting up a mechanism to prevent mid-air incidents.

“Our country’s principle is that we will assert our position firmly in a stern but calm manner,” Suga said. “And we keep the window of dialogue open.”

The Yomiuri Shimbun reported that the US and Japan planned to enhance military cooperation in the area, with Tokyo permanently stationing E-2C early-warning planes in Okinawa, and US Global Hawk unmanned drones expected to be operated from Japan soon.

US vice president Joe Biden is visiting the region next week, and administration officials said that while in Beijing he will raise Washington’s concerns about the ADIZ, and China’s assertiveness towards its neighbours.

The Philippines has voiced concern that China may extend control of air space over disputed areas of the South China Sea, where the two nations have a separate territorial dispute.

The islands dispute lay dormant for decades but flared in September 2012 when Tokyo purchased three of the uninhabited outcrops from private owners.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Beijing accused Tokyo of changing the status quo and has since sent surveillance ships and aircraft to the area, prompting Japan to scramble fighter jets hundreds of times.

TAGS: China, Diplomacy, dispute, Global Nation, Japan

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.