Recruitment agencies charge excessive fees | Global News

Recruitment agencies charge excessive fees

Charging excessive fees and misrepresentation topped the list of violations committed by various recruitment agencies in the country, according to data from the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA).

In the data provided to the OFW Journalism Consortium, the two violations stand out among the 147 types of infringements handled by POEA arbiters between 2006 and 2010.

Last year, misrepresentation topped the POEA violation list with 1,712 cases, while excessive charging had 1,208 cases.

Article continues after this advertisement

The misrepresentation violation was the subject of 1,172 cases in 2006, 1,711 in 2007, 2,006 cases in 2008, and 2,515 cases in 2009.

FEATURED STORIES

Meanwhile, over-charging had 871 cases in 2006, 1,279 in 2007, 1,778 in 2008 and 1,870 in 2009.

The POEA has an adjudication branch that handles cases arising from violations of recruitment regulations and disciplinary cases. This office is tied to POEA’s licensing branch since the violations by recruitment agencies are evaluated in connection with  the licenses the agency hands out to recruiters.

Article continues after this advertisement

Other types of violations in 2010 included non-issuance of appropriate receipts, 890 cases; default on contractual obligation to the migrant worker and to its Philippine agent, 527; premature collection of fees, 419; and misrepresentation for purposes of job application or employment, 383.

Article continues after this advertisement

If a POEA adjudicator decides there is basis to charge an agency with illegal recruitment, the agency can file the case.

Article continues after this advertisement

Cases move very  slowly

In 2010, the POEA handled 1,648 illegal recruitment cases but the disposition rate, or cases resolved, was only at 17 percent.

Article continues after this advertisement

The POEA data shows that in 2010, only 12 people were arrested for illegal recruitment, and only six establishments were closed.

On the other hand, a policy study by the state-run Philippine Institute of Development Studies on regulating labor migration found POEA’s resolution of welfare and adjudication cases as “satisfactory.”

Authors Dr. Aniceto Orbeta and Michael Abrigo observed that illegal recruitment cases cannot be resolved rapidly.

“Something’s wrong with the letter of the law and the capacity to handle these recruitment cases,” Orbeta said at a recent regional policy forum on migration management in Southeast Asia. OFW Journalism Consortium

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: OFW, Overseas employment, POEA, Recruitment agency

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.