MANILA, Philippines—The Supreme Court has banned the public screening of the anti-Islam film “Innocence of Muslims,” saying it infringes on religious rights.
The high tribunal on Tuesday directed the Movie and Television Review and Classification Board (MTRCB) not to allow the public showing of the film that has sparked violence across the globe.
However, the court has no ruling on whether the Philippines should ask YouTube to take down a 14-minute trailer of the movie, which mocks the Prophet Muhammad as fraud, womanizer and child molester.
The petitioners, who are members of the Bangsamoro Nation, mentioned that the film could be searched on Google and viewed on its video-sharing firm YouTube but failed to include them as respondents in their petition for a temporary restraining order, the Supreme Court said during Tuesday’s deliberation.
They only named as respondents Executive Secretary Paquito Ochoa Jr., MTRCB chairman Mary Grace Poe-Llamanzares and Commission on Information and Communication Technology chief Ivan John Uy.
The petitioners argued that the film, produced by self-described Coptic Christian Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, is an “invasion of constitutional guarantee of free exercise of religion and to practice religion without fear or hatred.”
In their 15 page plea, petitioners Agakhan “Benladin” Sharief, Datu Drieza Lininding, Datu Haj Ansari Alonto and Datu Nasser Dimapinto said that the government has the responsibility to ban the showing or any promotion of the “anti-Islamic film” that depicted their prophet as “a womanizer, homosexual and child abuser” and whose life was that of a “fool, philanderer and religious fake.”
The “Innocence of Muslims” has enraged many Muslims and at least 51 people, including the US ambassador to Libya, have been killed in violence linked to protests over the film, which also has renewed debate over freedom of expression in the US, Europe and even in the Philippines.
On Friday, law professor Harry Roque defied a ban by the University of the Philippines and held a class screening of the film, citing freedom of expression and academic freedom. With Associated Press