No immediate US aid in war with China, says lawmaker | Global News

No immediate US aid in war with China, says lawmaker

/ 02:40 AM April 30, 2012

Representative Roilo Golez on Sunday ruled out an immediate US aid to the Philippines in a shooting war with China over disputed islands in the South China Sea.

“There is no assurance the United States would help. It would depend on their perception of national interest. But for sure they will exert diplomatic efforts to ease tensions,” said the vice chairman of the House committee on national defense and security.

The Parañaque City lawmaker shrugged off as “premature and speculative” talk of a shooting war over the Spratly islands in the region Manila calls West Philippine Sea. The Spratlys are being claimed by four other countries—Taiwan, Brunei, Malaysia and Vietnam.

Article continues after this advertisement

‘World is watching’

FEATURED STORIES

“The last time it happened in the Spratlys was in 1988 between Chinese and Vietnamese navy units. Now, the world is watching this standoff and China will avoid being branded an irresponsible bully,” said Golez, a graduate of the US Naval Academy at Annapolis.

Bayan Muna Representative Neri Colmenares said that any US decision to step into the conflict between Manila and Beijing would depend largely on Washington’s interests considering its economic and diplomatic ties with China, the world’s second largest economy.

Article continues after this advertisement

‘Self-interest’

Article continues after this advertisement

“The US always acts in its self-interest,” said the leftist politician. “If it intervenes, it will only escalate the tension, and worse, we could end up ousting one bully only to be replaced by another bully, the US. This is dangerous as it is most likely that the two bullies will eventually come to a mutually beneficial agreement with us being left out,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“This is what happened between the US and Spain before and the US has more economic interest in China than in the Philippines,” said Colmenares.

He reckoned that China could “launch limited shooting war in the Scarborough Shoal if only to test our determination to defend our territory” as it had done in bloody attacks in the Paracels in 1974 and in 2005 that killed Vietnamese soldiers and fishermen.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Nationalist People’s Coalition (NPC) on Sunday expressed support of President Benigno Aquino III’s moves to bring the dispute with China to international arbitration.

Internationalize issue

NPC spokesperson and Valenzuela City Representative Rex Gatchalian said: “It is but proper to internationalize the issue so as to remind China … that we are living in a period of time when conflicts and disagreements between sovereign nations are resolved by applicable international laws and doctrines.”

Former Pangasinan Representative Mark Cojuangco, also of NPC, said China’s bullying tactics were driven by its desire to control  the mineral and oil deposits in waters within the country’s borders.

Seek advice

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“I support President Aquino’s strong stand in protecting our sovereignty and one of the best ways of doing it is by seeking the appropriate advice and opinion of other friendly countries like the United States. The Chinese could be violating international laws in as much as their stance is preventing us from enforcing our laws within our exclusive economic zone,” Cojuangco said.

TAGS: Bajo de Masinloc, Benigno Aquino III, China, Congress, Defense, Foreign affairs, Government, International relations, maritime dispute, Military, Philippines, Politics, Roilo Golez, Scarborough Shoal, Security, Spratlys, US

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.