Alice Guo's camp: She is not liable for perjury, falsification

Alice Guo’s camp: She is not liable for perjury, falsification

By: - Reporter / @zacariansINQ
/ 03:44 PM November 05, 2024

Alice Guo's camp: She is not liable for perjury, falsification

Alice Guo (real name: Guo Hua Ping) at the Senate of the Philippines on October 8, 2024.

MANILA, Philippines — Dismissed Bamban Mayor Alice Guo (real name: Guo Hua Ping) cannot be held liable for the notary issue on her counter-affidavit for the human trafficking case as she was already outside the country when it was notarized, her camp argued Tuesday.

Guo’s legal counsel, Atty. Stephen David, made the pronouncement after submitting a counter-affidavit seeking to dismiss the perjury and falsification charges against Guo in a preliminary investigation hearing held at the Department of Justice in Manila.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Our defense is that she shouldn’t be sued for falsification or perjury,” David said in Filipino in a chance interview with reporters.

FEATURED STORIES

“First of all, she was not here. So what would her participation be in the notarization?” he added.

READ: NBI files perjury raps vs lawyer who notarized Guo reply

Article continues after this advertisement

When asked about Guo’s assistants admitting that she instructed them to have the document notarized, David said Guo’s order does not mean she personally committed the falsification.

Article continues after this advertisement

“What is needed there is the act that she falsified the notarization herself,” he explained in Filipino.

Article continues after this advertisement

David also insisted that the document, which the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) previously deduced to have been signed by a different person, was “pre-signed” by Guo before she fled to Jakarta, Indonesia.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Alice Guo’s counter-affidavit signed by someone else – NBI

He explained that the counter-affidavit should not have been notarized in the first place if Guo herself was not present to sign the document in front of the lawyer or the notary public.

“So I don’t see any falsification there because she is the one who signed it. Now, who we should question is the one who notarized it,” he added.

Asked for his opinion on whether Guo should be held liable for the notarization error, David responded “no.”

“I cannot comment on that since it’s sub judice,” he added. But on the part of the affiant, the mayor, she wasn’t there. How would you say that she faced the lawyer? So you cannot make her liable.”

The cases stemmed from Guo’s counter-affidavit which was filed days after a qualified trafficking complaint was submitted against her for resolution on August 6.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Guo’s counter-affidavit was signed on August 14 by lawyer Elmer Galicia, almost a month after she had left the Philippines in July.

The NBI then filed complaints of perjury, falsification, and obstruction of justice against Guo and Galicia as well as four other individuals.

TAGS: Alice Guo, Department of Justice (DOJ)

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.