7 of 10 Filipinos won’t back pro-China bets – Pulse Asia
SURVEY CONDUCTED SEPT. 6-13

7 of 10 Filipinos won’t back pro-China bets – Pulse Asia

/ 05:20 AM October 15, 2024

MANILA, Philippines — Seven out of 10 Filipinos “will not support” candidates in the 2025 midterm elections who take positions favorable to China despite its maritime disputes with the Philippines, according to a Pulse Asia survey commissioned by the private think tank Stratbase Group.

Released on Monday, the results of the poll conducted from Sept. 6 to 13 showed that 73 percent of Filipinos said they would not support a candidate who is “pro-China at present or in the past.”

Only 5 percent of the respondents said they would support pro-China candidates, while 23 percent said they “cannot say.”

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: After Guo mess, COCs go online for public scrutiny

FEATURED STORIES

Pulse Asia polled 1,200 respondents nationwide. The survey had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

“Many Filipinos feel that China’s actions, particularly in the West Philippine Sea, directly challenge our sovereignty and undermine our nation’s interests,” Dindo Manhit, founder and CEO of Stratbase Group, said in a statement.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Electing pro-China candidates poses significant risks, as it will lead to policies that compromise our territorial integrity, economic interests,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Not just political

Manhit said the majority of Filipinos believed that a candidate’s position for or against China was “not just a political choice but a decision that can jeopardize our future and our nation’s standing in the global arena.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Manila and Beijing have had increasingly tense encounters in the West Philippine Sea, or the waters within the Philippines’ 370-kilometer exclusive economic zone in the South China Sea, which China claims almost entirely.

The Philippines accuses China of harassing its sailors and fishers using water cannons and lasers, despite a 2016 arbitral ruling that voided Beijing’s sweeping claims to the sea.

Article continues after this advertisement

By geographic area, the Pulse Asia survey found that the highest proportion of respondents who said they would not support pro-China candidates was highest in the Visayas (85 percent), followed by Metro Manila (83 percent), Mindanao (74 percent), and Luzon outside of Manila (65 percent).

By socioeconomic class, 74 percent of those belonging to Class E said they would not support pro-China candidates, followed by 73 percent from Class D, and 72 percent from Class ABC.

Survey respondents were also asked to pick up to three from a list of countries they consider the Philippines’ “most trusted partners” in national development.

US still most trusted

Only 1 percent of Filipinos chose China, based on the results.

The United States topped the list with 79 percent, followed by Japan (50 percent), Canada (43 percent), Australia (42 percent), the United Kingdom (18 percent), European Union (15 percent), South Korea (13 percent), Russia (7 percent) and India (2 percent).

Only 7 percent believe that China is a beneficial economic partner, the survey showed.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Among the “most beneficial economic partners of the Philippines” were the United States, with 66 percent, followed by Japan (43 percent), Australia (32 percent), Canada (31 percent), United Kingdom (16 percent), South Korea (15 percent), European Union (12 percent), Russia (11 percent) and India (8 percent).

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: candidates, Philippine elections, Pulse Asia, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.