This screen grab taken from a Blue Origin broadcast shows the Mission NS-25, with the New Shepard 4 rocket and crew capsule, taking off from the Blue Origin base near Van Horn, Texas, on May 19, 2024. Agence France-Presse
PARIS — How bad for your health is space travel? Answering this question will be crucial not just for astronauts aiming to go to Mars, but for a booming space tourism industry planning to blast anyone who can afford it into orbit.
In what was been billed as the most comprehensive look yet at the health effects of space, dozens of papers were published on Tuesday using new data from four SpaceX tourists onboard the first all-civilian orbital flight in 2021.
Researchers from more than 100 institutions across the world sifted through the data to demonstrate that human bodies change in a variety of ways once they reach space — but most go back to normal within months of returning to Earth.
READ: How can you become a space tourist?
Our bodies are put under a huge amount of stress while in space, from being blasted with radiation to the disorientating effect of weightlessness.
By studying astronauts, researchers have known for decades that space flight can cause health issues such as loss of bone mass, as well as heart, eyesight and kidney problems.
Fewer than 700 people have ever travelled into space, meaning that the sample size is small — and governments can be reticent when it comes to sharing all their findings.
However the four American tourists who spent three days in space during the Inspiration4 mission were happy to see their data made public.
READ: Japanese space tourists return to Earth after 12 days on ISS
The early results, which were compared to 64 other astronauts, were published in Nature journals on Tuesday.
When people are in space, they undergo changes to their blood, heart, skin, proteins, kidneys, genes, mitochondria, telomeres, cytokines and other health indicators, the researchers found.
But around 95 percent of their health markers returned to their previous level within three months.
‘I love my space scar’
The “big take-home” message is that people mostly make a rapid recovery after space flight, said one of the main study authors, Christopher Mason from Weill Cornell Medicine.
Mason told journalists he hoped the “most in-depth examination we’ve ever had of a crew” would help scientists understand what drugs or measures will be needed in the future to help protect people blasting off to space.
The Inspiration4 mission, financed by its billionaire captain Jared Isaacman, had the stated goal of demonstrating that space is accessible to people who have not spent years training for the feat.
READ: Blue Origin’s astro-tourism flight set to launch without big names
To do so, the four civilian astronauts received a huge number of medical tests.
“I love my space scar,” nurse Hayley Arceneaux said of the lingering mark from a skin biopsy. She was just 29 when she went into space.
One study found that the telomeres — caps similar to those on shoelaces which protect the ends of chromosomes from fraying — of all four subjects dramatically lengthened when they arrived in space.
But their telomeres all shrunk back to near their original length within months of them returning to Earth.
Because telomeres also lengthen as people age, finding a way to address this problem could help “us mere Earthlings” in the never-ending fight against ageing, said Colorado State University’s Susan Bailey.
It even could lead to anti-aging products such as “telomerase-infused face cream”, the study author speculated.
Safe mission to Mars?
Looking at the data so far, “there’s no reason we shouldn’t be able to safely get to Mars and back,” Mason said.
“You probably wouldn’t take multiple trips because it’s a lot of radiation,” he added.
One of the studies found that mice exposed to radiation equivalent to 2.5 years in space suffered permanent kidney damage.
“If we don’t develop new ways to protect the kidneys, I’d say that while an astronaut could make it to Mars they might need dialysis on the way back,” lead study author Keith Siew of the London Tubular Centre said in a statement.
But Mason emphasized that the research was “really mostly good news”.
“I think it bodes well for people who think: maybe I’ll go to space in six months,” he said.
While there was not enough data to say anything definitive, female astronauts seemed to be more tolerant of the stress of spaceflight, he added.
“It may be driven just by the fact that women have to give child birth,” meaning their bodies are more used to major changes, Mason said.