Drilon: SC ruling on PH's ICC exit cites 'limitations' of president's power on foreign policy | Global News

Drilon: SC ruling on PH’s ICC exit cites ‘limitations’ of president’s power on foreign policy

/ 02:39 PM March 17, 2021

Drilon: SC ruling on PH's ICC exit cites 'limitations' of president's power on foreign policy

Senator Franklin Drilon. PRIB File Photo

MANILA, Philippines — The Supreme Court (SC) still recognized “limitations” of the President’s power on the country’s foreign policy even as it junked petitions questioning the Philippine government’s withdrawal from the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), Senate Minority Leader Franklin Drilon pointed out on Wednesday.

Drilon was among senators who filed a petition in 2018 asking the high court to declare as ineffective the country’s withdrawal from ICC.

Article continues after this advertisement

“While the Supreme Court dismissed the petition questioning the validity of the Philippine government’s withdrawal from the Rome Statute for being moot and academic, the High Court acknowledged the limitations on the power of the President as chief architect of foreign policy,” the veteran lawmaker said in a statement Wednesday.

FEATURED STORIES

“This is a clear recognition of the limitations of the power of the President with respect to foreign policy. Most striking is the acknowledgment that the power of the President to withdraw ‘unilaterally’ can be subject to limitations by the Senate,” he added.

Drilon was referring to an SC statement regarding its decision to dismiss the 2018 petitions against the Philippines’ withdrawal from ICC.

Article continues after this advertisement

According to the high court’s statement, “The decision acknowledged that the President, as primary architect of foreign policy, is subject to the Constitution and existing statutes. Therefore, the power of the President to withdraw unilaterally can be limited by the conditions for concurrence by the Senate or when there is an existing law which authorizes the negotiation of a treaty or international agreement or when there is a statute that implements an existing treaty.”

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: SC dismisses plea seeking to declare as invalid PH’s withdrawal from ICC 

Article continues after this advertisement

Drilon described the SC’s decision as “highly interesting,” adding he would “comment more extensively” on the ruling once the full text has been released.

President Rodrigo Duterte announced the country’s withdrawal from the international court a month after the ICC said it opened a “preliminary examination” in February 2018 on allegations that Duterte had committed crimes against humanity with his administration’s war on drugs.

Article continues after this advertisement

Despite this, however, the ICC had said it will keep an eye on the alleged crimes against humanity under the Duterte administration.

The ICC is a permanent court that investigates, prosecutes, and tries those accused of committing the crime of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression.

KGA
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Features, Global Nation, ICC, Rodrigo Duterte, Roman Statute, Senate Minority Leader Franklin Drilon, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.