Palace: PH ‘not waiving’ maritime rights in South China Sea | Global News

Palace: PH ‘not waiving’ maritime rights in South China Sea

05:44 AM July 16, 2020

MANILA, Philippines — The Philippines continues to “assert’’ its rights in the South China Sea even as it pursues bilateral ties with China, presidential spokesperson Harry Roque said on Wednesday.

“We have not waived, nor have we relinquished these rights,” Roque said in a statement.

A Social Weather Stations mobile phone survey showed that 70 percent of Filipinos believe the government should assert its rights over the islands in the disputed sea.

Article continues after this advertisement

In a case brought by the Philippines, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, Netherlands, invalidated Beijing’s sweeping claims over the South China Sea on July 12, 2016. China has refused to recognize the ruling. Roque acknowledged that there was no way to ensure that the ruling was implemented.

FEATURED STORIES

“Unfortunately, the Permanent Court of Arbitration ruling has no way of being enforced by the body which rendered it, so we must look to other means to resolve the dispute,” he said, adding that the Philippines has been resorting to “peaceful and diplomatic” ways to work out the conflict.

The territorial dispute does not make up the entirety of the relationship between the two countries, Roque said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We agree to disagree on the arbitral tribunal ruling and will proceed with our bilateral relations with China, especially on matters related to trade and the economy,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Closer ties

Since assuming his post in 2016, President Rodrigo Duterte has cultivated closer ties with China and put the ruling on the back burner.

Article continues after this advertisement

He has also distanced the country from its traditional ally, the United States, which recently declared “unlawful” most of China’s maritime claims in the South China Sea. Foreign Secretary Teodoro Locsin Jr., for his part, struck a conciliatory tone with his Chinese counterpart a few days after asserting that the 2016 arbitral ruling was “nonnegotiable” and should be complied with by China.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi initiated the video meeting with Locsin on Tuesday afternoon, on the heels of US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo warning China against its “unlawful” claims in the disputed sea.

Article continues after this advertisement

The hourlong video call saw Locsin and Wang articulating their respective positions “in exchanges that were frank, open but cordial throughout,” the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) said.

The two foreign ministers reaffirmed that the maritime dispute over China’s encroachment into the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone in the South China Sea was not “the sum total” of the bilateral relationship.

‘Friendly consultation’

The DFA also said both sides agreed to continue to manage contentious issues and maritime cooperation “in friendly consultation.”

The statement reflected the administration’s placatory stance on China’s aggression in the disputed sea, and was an apparent turnaround from Locsin’s strong statement last Sunday on the fourth anniversary of the arbitral ruling.

“Compliance in good faith with the award would be consistent with the obligations of the Philippines and China under international law, including the [UN Convention on the Law of the Seas] to which both parties are signatories,” Locsin said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

—With a report from Dona Z. Pazzibugan

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: Harry Roque, maritime dispute, PH-China Relations, South China Sea, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.