Spratlys ‘historically, legally’ ours - China spokesman

Spratlys ‘historically, legally’ ours – China spokesman

/ 04:20 PM April 12, 2019

Spratlys ‘historically, legally’ ours - China spokesman

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang AFP FILE PHOTO / NICOLAS ASFOURI

MANILA, Philippines — China has maintained that the disputed Spratly Islands are within its territory as supported by “sufficient historical and legal basis.”

Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Lu Kang made this assertion on Thursday in response to Foreign Affairs Secretary Teodoro Locsin’s earlier statement upholding the Philippines’ claim over the West Philippine Sea.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: West PH Sea: China took what is ours – Locsin

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Palace: PH sovereignty ‘non-negotiable’

“We have taken note of those remarks made by the Philippine officials. The Nansha Islands (Spratly Islands) are within China’s territory, for which we have sufficient historical and legal basis,” Lu was quoted as saying in a transcription of his press conference posted on the website of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Article continues after this advertisement

“For thousands of years, Chinese fishermen have been fishing in these waters in the South China Sea. Their rights should not be challenged,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Philippines and China are locked in a longstanding maritime dispute over the South China Sea with Beijing claiming nearly the entire South China Sea, including parts of the West Philippine Sea.

Article continues after this advertisement

In January 2013, the Philippines filed a case challenging the expansive claims of China in the South China Sea before the United Nations Permanent Court of Arbitration.

The arbitral tribunal ruled in favor of the country’s sovereignty over the WPS in July 2016, which China refused to recognize.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: PH wins arbitration case over South China Sea

President Rodrigo Duterte has chosen to set aside the ruling and pursue warmer ties with the Asian economic powerhouse.

Lu added that the disputes involving the South China Sea should be “resolved through negotiations between China and countries directly concerned including the Philippines.”

“We are committed to upholding peace and stability in the South China Sea in concert with other regional countries,” he said.

However, Duterte recently warned China not to touch Pag-asa (Thitu) Island, which is the main island feature in the Philippine-occupied Kalayaan Island Group.

READ: Duterte to China: We’re pals but don’t touch Pag-asa 

The President made the statement after a report by the military’s Western Command showed a surge of vessels from a Chinese fishing fleet around Pag-asa Island.

READ: Chinese sea militia swarms around Pag-asa Island – military 

Given the alleged incursion of China in the West Philippine Sea with the presence of its vessels, Lu described the situation as “generally stable, and steady progress has been made in the consultations on the COC (code of conduct.)”

Lu further called on the Philippine government to join China in “properly managing the South China Sea issue” as well as “upholding peace and tranquility on the sea, and bringing more benefits to the two peoples.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“We hope that the Philippine side will join us in strictly implementing the important consensus reached by the two leaders on properly resolving the South China Sea issue and safeguarding peace and stability in the South China Sea,” he said.

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: China, Lu Kang, Nansha Islands, Spratly Islands, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.