Unlike PH, Vietnam’s ‘modest upgrades’ in Spratlys get no repulse from China |

Unlike PH, Vietnam’s ‘modest upgrades’ in Spratlys get no repulse from China

/ 08:41 PM April 10, 2019

Unlike PH, Vietnam’s ‘modest upgrades’ in Spratlys get no repulse from China

Chinese fishing vessels at Subi Reef on August 12, 2018. (Photo from Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative)

MANILA, Philippines — China showed no unusual resistance to Vietnam’s “modest upgrades” to its facilities in the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea contrary to how it responded to the Philippines’ rehabilitation efforts, analysts have observed. 

Vietnam occupies 49 outposts spread across 27 features in the contested Spratly Islands, while the Philippines has 9. 

Article continues after this advertisement

“Vietnam continues quietly upgrading its facilities across the Spratlys, so far without provoking the same large-scale paramilitary response from China as Philippine upgrades have,” Washington think-tank Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative said in its latest report on the South China Sea. 

FEATURED STORIES

China’s deployment of dozens of vessels around Pag-asa Island since last year was   largely attributed by security experts and even the Philippine military as a response to ongoing construction of a beaching ramp there.

The Philippines started to build a beaching ramp in its biggest outpost in the Spratlys in 2018. The long overdue repair of the runway will start after the construction of the ramp, which is expected in mid-2019. 

Article continues after this advertisement

More than 200 Chinese fishing vessels were spotted around Thitu for the first three months of 2019. The Philippine government recently filed a diplomatic protest over the incident. 

Article continues after this advertisement

The AMTI said some of Vietnam’s recent expansion include an extension of its runway and construction of hangars for its transport assets. 

Article continues after this advertisement

“It seems that regardless of external factors, whether amid negotiations and relative calm or tensions and threats of violence, Hanoi is committed to a steady but modest expansion of its capabilities in and around the Spratly Islands,” it said. 

The construction efforts of the Philippines and Vietnam are not the same scale with China, which built massive artificial islands on shoals and reefs, topped with airstrips and missile defense systems.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Hanoi’s upgrades seem geared toward expanding its ability to monitor and patrol contested waters and, especially in the case of its pillbox and DK1 platforms, improve living conditions and ensure it can resupply by air if necessary,” AMTI said. 

The Philippines, China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei have conflicting claims over the South China Sea, one of the world’s busiest waterways.

Among Asean claimants, Vietnam is the most vocal critic of China’s militarization of the South China Sea.  

A UN-backed international arbitral tribunal ruled in July 2016 to invalidate China’s claim to nearly all of the strategic waters but Beijing refused to acknowledge the ruling. 

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

President Rodrigo Duterte has played down the ruling as he sought economic and trade investments from China. /kga

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: China, Global Nation, local news, Military, nation, national news, News, Pag-asa Island, Philippine news updates, Philippines, South China Sea, sovereignty, Spratyls, Vietnam, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.