Cayetano calls Carpio, Alejano liars, won’t go to Sandy Cay | Global News

Cayetano calls Carpio, Alejano liars, won’t go to Sandy Cay

By: - Reporter / @MRamosINQ
/ 07:00 AM June 16, 2018

Sen. Alan Peter Cayetano US Ambassador to the Philippines Philip Goldberg China Transportation Secretary Arthur Tugade President Rodrigo Duterte

Foreign Affairs Secretary Alan Peter Cayetano. LYN RILLON/INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

Acting Chief Justice Antonio Carpio and Magdalo Rep. Gary Alejano are “liars” using the country’s territorial row with China to undermine the Duterte administration, Foreign Secretary Alan Peter Cayetano said on Friday.

Cayetano hit out at the two most vocal critics of President Duterte’s policy on the South China Sea for insisting that China had control over Sandy Cay, a sandbar located about 4.6 kilometers from Philippine-occupied Pag-asa (Thitu) Island in the Spratly archipelago.

Article continues after this advertisement

“They are absolutely liars,” he told CNN Philippines, referring to Carpio and Alejano. “They are liars. They are trying to take down the government. They are lying left and right about it.”

FEATURED STORIES

Cayetano, however, refused to take on Alejano’s challenge for him to sail to Sandy Cay and disprove the lawmaker’s claim that Beijing had seized control of the sea feature.

‘Not prudent for me’

Article continues after this advertisement

“He wants to challenge me to go there to create an issue because a foreign secretary of one [of the claimant-states] is going there to claim [the area],” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It won’t be prudent for me to go. But of the 110 million Filipinos, will our territorial claim be proven only if I go there? If any other Juan dela Cruz would go there, wouldn’t their presence be enough?”

Article continues after this advertisement

Carpio, a member of the Philippine legal team that won an arbitral court’s landmark ruling invalidating China’s claim to almost 95 percent of the South China Sea, had previously accused Beijing of “invading” Sandy Cay.

Last year, the magistrate said Beijing sent two Navy frigates, a coast guard vessel and two fishing boats to the area to guard Sandy Cay.

Article continues after this advertisement

“By any yardstick, this is seizure of Philippine territory,” Carpio claimed.

Alejano also disclosed that China had planted its flag on another sand cay located 12.6 km northeast of Kota (Loaita) Island, near the limits of the country’s 370-km exclusive economic zone.

But Cayetano reiterated that the Philippines still controlled Sandy Cay.

“No one built on Sandy Cay. It’s uninhabited and it’s just next to Pag-asa. So we’re free to patrol there. Our fishermen can go there,” he said.

Geopolitics involved

The country’s top diplomat also said that the Sandy Cay issue involved “geopolitics.”

“This is a battle of the superpowers. It [involves] the national security of the [United States] in the region and the national security of China,” he said.

Sen. Loren Legarda, chair of the foreign affairs committee, said on Friday that in a bid to “diffuse tensions” in the disputed waterway, the Senate would determine how best to respond to China’s aggressive actions.

Beijing has installed missile and radar systems on three Philippine-claimed reefs and Chinese coast guards have harassed Filipino fishermen in Panatag (Scarborough) Shoal.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“We will soon conduct a public hearing and I will work with my colleagues, including the committee on national defense and security, in determining how best to support current initiatives to diffuse the tension, while at the same time protecting our sovereignty and territorial rights,” she said in a statement. —WITH A REPORT FROM DJ YAP

TAGS: Alejano, Carpio, Cayetano, DFA, Pag-asa Island

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.