Gatchalian sees nothing wrong in renaming Benham Rise | Global News

Gatchalian sees nothing wrong in renaming Benham Rise

‘WE HAVE DONE IT IN THE WEST PHILIPPINE SEA’

benham-rise

Benham Rise

A change in names is no problem.

This was how Sen. Sherwin Gatchalian reacted on Sunday to Malacañang’s plan to rename Benham Rise to Philippine Rise.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Palace on Saturday said the Office of the Executive Secretary will conduct the study to effect the renaming of Benham Rise, a 24 million hectare continental shelf that the Philippines was granted sovereign rights by the United Nations.

FEATURED STORIES

Presidential spokesperson Ernesto Abella said the renaming of Benham Rise was intended to “emphasize Philippine sovereign rights and jurisdiction over the area.”

In a text message, Gatchalian, who led a Senate inquiry into Benham Rise last week, reminded there were “no existing territorial disputes in the Benham Rise area.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“Therefore, the Philippines has complete jurisdiction over the 24.4 million hectares of Benham Rise,” Gatchalian said.

The senator said he did not see anything wrong in changing the name of Benham Rise in the future. “We have done it in the West Philippine Sea,” he said, referring to islands being claimed in the disputed South China Sea.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

For comprehensive coverage, in-depth analysis, visit our special page for West Philippine Sea updates. Stay informed with articles, videos, and expert opinions.

TAGS: Benham Rise, Global Nation, Philippine news updates, Philippine Rise, Sherwin Gatchalian, West Philippine Sea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.