Fil-Am activists decry US high court split on deportation relief

/ 02:19 AM June 25, 2016

DACA recipient Beatrice Sanchez. DACASF

OAKLAND, California – A Filipino American civil rights and community service group decried the US Supreme Court’s split decision (4 – 4) in the case of United States v. Texas, stifling the implementation of President Obama’s humanitarian efforts to expand DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) and provide deportation relief for parents of American citizens and legal permanent residents through a program called DAPA (Deferred Action for Parents of Americans).

Oakland-based Filipino Advocates for Justice explained that “sadly” the decision means that Obama’s attempt to help more immigrant families is still on hold, and the case will now be sent back to the Texas district court to determine the programs’ constitutionality.  However, FAJ stressed that the original DACA program, launched in 2012, is still available and is NOT affected by the Supreme Court’s decision.


“This decision does not change the existing DACA program,” says Rachel Aceberos, FAJ immigration counselor. “Eligible undocumented immigrants should continue to apply for and renew DACA in order to access its many benefits.  For those who are DACA eligible, don’t be discouraged.  The more young people access DACA, the clearer it is that relief from deportation is needed and that we need a real legalization program.”

“This decision hurts because we fought hard to protect young people and families from deportation,” said Beatrice Sanchez, a DACA recipient. “But we are warriors.  We will organize harder, raise our voices louder, and come together even stronger than before.  This includes getting out the vote for leaders who will fight for the rights of immigrant communities.”


Sanchez said further: “This is a call to action for the new American majority to use our vote this November to remove immigrant-hating legislators — particularly Governors — and replace them with public officials who recognize the contributions of and embrace immigrant communities.


Rachel Aceberos, Filipino Advocates for Justice immigration counselor. LINKEDIN

The organization applauded the “more rational direction of the California State Legislature who, just yesterday, passed the Dignity Not Detention Act (SB 1289).”

SB 1289 prohibits municipalities from contracting with for-profit immigration detention companies (like GEO Group and CCA), requires all detention facilities in California to uphold humane standards and allows immigrants to sue if their rights are violated.

Beyond the elections FAJ will continue to fight for the protection and expansion of immigrants’ rights including fair and humane legalization of the undocumented, Aceberos said.

Sidebar: DACA/DAPA Facts


  • 75 percent of DAPA and expanded DACA-eligible Californians have resided in the US for more than a decade.
  • Approximately 80,000 immigrants living in the San Francisco Bay Area could have benefited from DAPA and expanded DACA)
  • 70 percent of all undocumented Californians live in a family with at least one citizen and/or Legal Permanent Resident.
  • 19 percent of all minor children have at least one parent who is undocumented – and more than 80 percent of those children are US citizens.
  •     DAPA- and expanded DACA-eligible residents have high rates of employment and are fundamental to the larger California economy.

Source: Expanding Opportunity: How California Gains if the President’s Executive Actions on Immigration are Implemented by Manuel Pastor, Justin Scoggins, and Jared Sanchez, USC Center for the Study of Immigrant Integration.


Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), DAPA (Deferred Action for Parents of Americans), Filipino Advocates for Justice, Filipino Americans on Supreme Court United States v. Texas decision, United.States. v. Texas, US immigration, US relief from deportation, US Supreme Court
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

© Copyright 1997-2020 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.