Palace disputes Nancy Binay’s claim on OFW legal fund | Global News

Palace disputes Nancy Binay’s claim on OFW legal fund

/ 05:49 AM September 17, 2015

Not true.

The Department of Budget and Management has disputed Sen. Nancy Binay’s claim that the administration did not allot funds for the legal assistance of troubled overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) in the proposed 2016 national budget.

In a statement, the DBM on Wednesday pointed out that the legal aid fund (LAF) allocation is “present as a line item in the proposed budget of the Department of Foreign Affairs under Foreign Policy Services.”

Article continues after this advertisement

With the allocation, “our OFWs will continue to have access to crucial legal assistance,” said the agency.

FEATURED STORIES

“This is contrary to statements made by Sen. Binay, who claimed that next year’s proposed budget did not appropriate funds for this purpose,” it emphasized.

The department also denied the senator’s allegation that the OFW legal assistance fund has been dwindling since last year.

Article continues after this advertisement

It noted that Republic Act 10022, which amended the Migrant Workers and Overseas Filipinos Act of 1995, mandated the creation of the LAF, intended for OFWs facing charges, litigation expenses, court fees and bail bonds. The law further directed the government to appropriate no less than P30 million each year for the legal aid fund.

According to the DBM, the LAF allocation in the 2015 General Appropriations Act was increased to P100 million.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: budget, DBM, Nancy Binay, national budget, ofws, Overseas Filipino workers

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.