Prosecutors in Jennifer Laude murder ask judge to inhibit from case | Global News

Prosecutors in Jennifer Laude murder ask judge to inhibit from case

By: - Correspondent / @amacatunoINQ
/ 10:12 PM January 05, 2015

Photo from Olongapo City Police

Photo from Olongapo City Police

OLONGAPO CITY, Philippines – The public prosecutors in the murder case against US Marine Private First Class Joseph Scott Pemberton on Monday filed a motion for inhibition against the judge hearing the case as they questioned her transparency and neutrality.

The prosecution panel, headed by the Olongapo City Chief Prosecutor Emilie Fe de los Santos, filed the motion against Judge Roline Ginez-Jabalde of the Regional Trial Court Branch 74 at 5:22 p.m., citing her association with the American soldier’s lawyer.

Article continues after this advertisement

The prosecutors also said Jabalde has put them in a “wait and see” situation since the case was filed in court on Dec. 15.

FEATURED STORIES

Pemberton is facing a murder charge for allegedly killing transgender Jeffrey “Jennifer” Laude inside a motel here on Oct. 11.

The prosecutors said Jabalde and lawyer Rowena Garcia-Flores, Pemberton’s counsel, were classmates in San Beda College’s law school.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It became clear to the prosecution that the relationship between [Jabalde] and [Flores] — that of being classmates in law school — has tainted the Honorable Presiding Judge’s transparency and neutrality in the conduct of the proceedings,” the motion said.

Article continues after this advertisement

The prosecutors also said Jabalde conducted a court proceeding without their presence when Pemberton appeared in court on Dec. 19.

Article continues after this advertisement

They said they found Jabalde talking with Pemberton and Flores inside the courtroom before the prosecutors could join the proceeding.

“This scene immediately alarmed the prosecution giving it as it does an impression that a proceeding with respect to the case was already being conducted without the presence of any public prosecutor,” they said in their 12-page motion.

Article continues after this advertisement

Jabalde declined to comment on the motion asking for her inhibition.

The Philippine Daily Inquirer tried but failed to contact Flores on Monday. However, in one of the past hearings, Flores acknowledged that she and Jabalde were law classmates.

The prosecutors also said that the failure of Jabalde to arraign Pemberton had allowed the soldier’s lawyers to file a petition for review before the Department of Justice. They said Jabalde could have dismissed Pemberton’s petition for review had he been arraigned when he appeared in court on Dec. 19.

The prosecutors said they were made to wait for 25 minutes in the courtroom during the appearance of Pemberton and were not informed that Jabalde would no longer arraign the American soldier.

“The prosecution was immediately placed on a wait and see stance — a situation which could have been easily avoided by a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ reply — and doubt has dawned upon the transparency with which the proceedings will be conducted by the Honorable Presiding Judge,” they said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The other members of the prosecution panel are Assistant City Prosecutor Ria Sususco; Assistant State Prosecutor Nolibien Quiambao; and Associate City Prosecutors Laurence Joel Taliping, Rommel Baligod and Catherine Mesuelo.

TAGS: courts, Crime, Emilie Fe de los Santos, Global Nation, Joseph Scott Pemberton, Justice, Law, litigation, murder, Olongapo City Regional Trial Court Branch 74, Roline Ginez-Jabalde, Rowena Garcia Flores, trial court judges, trials

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.