Court case vs Chinese poachers postponed for 3rd time | Global News

Court case vs Chinese poachers postponed for 3rd time

/ 05:16 PM June 18, 2014

PUERTO PRINCESA CITY, Philippines — A court case against a group of Chinese fishermen facing jail in the Philippines for poaching was postponed for a third time on Wednesday, after the government accused China of frustrating the proceedings.

The fate of the nine fishermen has worsened an already bitter row between the Philippines and China over competing territorial claims in the South China Sea, because they were arrested last month in disputed waters.

A court on the westernmost Philippine island of Palawan that is meant to hear the case on Wednesday postponed the pre-trial hearing until July 1 after their lawyer appealed for more time, prosecutor Alen Rodriguez told AFP.

Article continues after this advertisement

Chinese fishermen arrested by Philippine maritime police for poaching in the West Philippine Sea. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

The pre-trial hearing was initially scheduled for June 4, but has now been postponed three times.

FEATURED STORIES

The proceedings had previously been postponed due to the court’s inability to find an interpreter for the Chinese.

President Benigno Aquino’s spokesman said on Tuesday the Chinese embassy in Manila was partly to blame for the delays by not assisting in providing an interpreter.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Chinese embassy officials don’t want to participate in the proceedings. They don’t want to provide an interpreter for the Chinese fishermen,” spokesman Herminio Coloma said, citing comments from Rodriguez.

Article continues after this advertisement

Local ethnic Chinese residents have in the past acted in similar cases. One of those residents initially translated for the fishermen at their arraignment hearing last month, but then withdrew his services.

Article continues after this advertisement

Some of the ethnic Chinese residents told AFP that, after meeting a Chinese diplomat, they decided not to work on the case because they felt intimidated and did not want to antagonize the Chinese government.

However a young ethnic Chinese resident was finally persuaded to act as an interpreter, according to Rodriquez, and helped the fishermen at Wednesday’s proceedings.

Article continues after this advertisement

A Chinese embassy spokesman did not respond to requests for comment.

The Chinese government has previously said it does not recognize the case and demanded the fishermen be released immediately, insisting they were fishing legally in waters belonging to China.

Police detained the fishermen on May 6 near Half Moon Shoal in the South China Sea, 111 kilometers (69 miles) off Palawan.

They were charged with poaching an endangered species, which carries a maximum jail term of 20 years, after hundreds of turtles were allegedly found on their boat.

The Philippines insists it has sovereign rights to the shoal, which is part of its exclusive economic zone and more than 1,000 kilometers from the nearest major Chinese landmass.

But China claims nearly all of the South China Sea, even waters approaching the coasts of its neighbors.

The dispute has severely strained relations in recent years, with the Philippines accusing China of embarking on an “expansionist agenda” that has included creating artificial islands in areas close to the Philippines.

RELATED STORIES

Sea turtles freed; Chinese fishermen held

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

9 of 11 Chinese poachers face rap for violating fisheries code

TAGS: China, Conservation, Diplomacy, Global Nation, maritime dispute, Philippines, Poaching, trial

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.