Experts differ on North Korea nuclear capability


In this April 5, 2009 image made from KRT video, a rocket is lifted off from its launch pad in Musudan-ri, North Korea. AP FILE PHOTO

SEOUL—Findings from a report by the US military spy agency suggest North Korea could be capable of launching a ballistic missile with a nuclear warhead. The Pentagon and South Korea’s defense ministry have cast strong doubts on the assessment.

What do we know for sure?

Not a great deal.

North Korea has conducted three nuclear tests, in 2006, 2009 and 2013. The 2013 underground test was by far the most powerful. But the radioactive fallout was well contained.

Numerous experts believe it may have been a uranium bomb, rather than a plutonium device as used in the previous two tests.

North Korea has only successfully tested one medium-range ballistic missile, the Rodong-1, with a range of 1,300 kilometers.

In 1998 it launched a Taepodong-1 (2,500 kilometers) over Japan, but the third stage apparently exploded. A Taepodong-2 (6,700 km) was tested in 2006 but blew up after 40 seconds.

In December, the North successfully put a satellite into orbit with its Unha-3 long-range rocket.

What does North Korea claim?

A great deal.

The North Korean military says it already has an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) capability and can accurately deliver a nuclear warhead to targets as far away as the continental United States.

Pyongyang said the February 2013 test was of a “miniaturized” device and that it now had a “diversified” weapons capability—suggesting both uranium and plutonium bombs.

What is the expert consensus?


Nearly all experts agree that North Korea is years from developing a genuine ICBM capability.

The issue of miniaturization is more debated. A few experts believe Pyongyang may have already mastered this technique, but the majority believe it would require one or two more tests to develop a working warhead that could fit on a missile.

Delivery system capability is highly speculative. Even at the midrange level, the North’s ballistic missile record is extremely shaky.

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • speaksoftlylove

    Stop these nonsense.

    Tumayo na yong mga Musudan missiles ni Kim Jong Un sa launch pad nila kahapon sabay higa ulit. Tigas ihi lang pala yang hitad na Kim Jong Un. Kulang lang sa pansin ang kumag ang sarap kutusan.

  • farmerpo

    REMEBER the parable of the donkey, donkeys.

  • notmeitsthedog

    Ha-ha. Was this article taken from a tabloid or was this written by Senator Santiago?
    First of all, the nuclear fall out was not “well contained” because there was none, nada; it was conducted underground. Ha-ha.
    Second, it doesn’t make sense to make an effort to miniaturize the bomb that just went dud on it’s first 2 test.
    Lastly, if there was even a hint that Nokor will use a nuclear weapon, South Korea and foreign embassies would at least flinch.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks




latest videos