Malaysia tightens control of barter trade, flow of foreigners into Sabah

A+
A
A-

AP FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—While the Philippines has not given up its claim to Sabah, the Philippine Embassy in Kuala Lumpur has asked Filipino barter traders to comply with fresh Malaysian regulations “notably requiring Filipinos and other foreigners” to present passports or seaman’s books if they wish to do business in the disputed state and the neighboring territory of Labuan.

In a statement, the Philippine Embassy in Kuala Lumpur said the new guidelines would take effect on April 15, according to a note verbale the Malaysian Foreign Ministry sent to diplomatic missions around Malaysia.

The document states that crews of trade ships or vessels will be required “to produce valid travel documents, i.e. international passport or seaman’s book at all entry ports in Sabah.” The documents are now required before Malaysia issues Seaman Identification Cards (SICs) to Filipino barter traders.

This tightens immigration control in Malaysian ports allowing the barter trade—Sandakan, Tawau and Kudat in Sabah and one in the Federal Territory of Labuan—where Filipino traders previously only had to present a valid medical examination certificate and pay 50 Malaysian Ringgit in order to be issued SICs.

The document added that permanent Customs and Immigration Quarantine posts will start operations in ports in the towns of Kudat and Lahad Datu on Apr. 2, along with an Immigration Control Office at Karakit, Pulau Banggi also in Sabah “where all immigration and customs procedures will be enforced.”

“The Embassy wishes to call the attention of all barter traders and other concerned parties to the new regulation, otherwise they may be significantly inconvenienced if they are found by Malaysian authorities to be in violation,” Consul General Medardo Macaraig said in a statement released by the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) on Monday.

Asked why the Philippines was abiding by Malaysia’s immigration regulations despite the country’s standing claim to Sabah, Assistant Secretary Raul Hernandez, the foreign office’s spokesman, said: “They (Malaysians) are in control of the area and they have come up with regulations. And if our people would like to continue on with these arrangements with barter trading, then there is a need to comply with that regulation.”

The DFA has been careful in references to Sabah and Filipino citizens there, ensuring that no official word could be interpreted as a surrender of the Philippines’ territorial claim. The Philippines has also refused to establish permanent consular presence in the territory as such would imply recognition of Sabah as a foreign land.

Citing the new rules, the Embassy said barter traders might only stay in Sabah for seven days, no extensions allowed. Crewmen are also barred from boarding a different boat until they return to their country of origin, according to the Department of Foreign Affairs.

The DFA warned that violators could face charges under Malaysian Immigration Act and new regulations against Trafficking in Persons and Smuggling of Migrants in the country, with penalties ranging from five to 20 years in jail.

Malaysia imposed such stricter immigration and customs regulations in Sabah’s ports while its forces pursued members of the Sulu Royal Army still standing their ground to press for the Sulu Sultanate’s claims to the territory.

The Philippine government has been urging the Sultanate’s followers to return to Sulu to end the bloodshed, with assurances that it has not given up on the country’s claim to resource-rich Sabah.

The Philippine mission in Kuala Lumpur also said consular officials were finally able to visit on Mar. 28 eight Filipinos detained by Malaysian authorities in connection with the fighting between Malaysian forces and the Sulu Royal Army in Lahad Datu.

The Embassy said the visit to Filipino detainees at a prison facility in Tawau was arranged in coordination with the Malaysian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Attorney General’s Chambers and Tawau prison officials.

The Philippines has been pressing for Malaysia to grant access for its consular teams to visit Filipino detainees in Sabah citing international law.

“Our team in Sabah has already visited the eight Filipinos detained under the custody of the Malaysian authorities. We are still waiting for the full report from our Embassy which I think will have first to be submitted to the President before we could share with you some details,” Hernandez said yesterday.

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • R_RR

    So, it appears that prior to Kiram’s adventure in Sabah, the Malaysian authorities were lax. They allowed the Filipinos to enter Sabah without documents. This is something…..

    • headhunter

      Unfortunately yes
      Stupid but true

    • Malaysian in Singapore

      Yup. (Stupidity + laziness + greed) x years of neglect = the current situation!
      How else would a country end up with a situation whereby deportation of illegals can be considered as in humane? Serve BN right!
      Now that everything is out in the open, they have a lot to answer to the rakyat.

      • R_RR

        Ah okay, thanks for the confirmation.

      • Malaysian in Singapore

        I was commenting about BN, not Malaysia. The latter is our motherland, while the former we can easily divorce come this election, so don’t you get all smirk-y. Anyway, looks like you require hand holding to understand a simple comment:

        1) greed = BN’s traitorous project IC, put into place to get votes so that BN could remain in power

        2) Laziness = should have just strengthened the border patrol in the first place, demolish all illegal huts b4 they have the opportunity to grow into a whole villages

        3) Stupidity = for thinking that letting illegals in on such a massive scale would not have any impact on the national security!

        To progress, one must realise where the fault lies. Vehement denial is not only foolish and counter productive, it will get us no where. Look at the Kirams; if only they had governed their land properly, the lands would not have turned out this way.

      • R_RR

        Of course I understand clearly the difference between a country and a political party. Geez, you’re not talking to a person from a faraway place. You’re having a conversation with a Pinoy. KAU TAHULAH?

        I never supported the actions of Kirams. What they did was illegal – bringing of guns and espousing violence in Sabah. That’s stupidity at its best.

      • headhunter

        ok Nestor, you are one of the rare level headed Pinoy

    • http://www.facebook.com/justone.sin JustOne Sin

      You are spot on. The Kirams, however, had woken up the authorities and even provided them coffee. Things are going to change, that’s for sure. What I am unsure about is whether this is for the better or worse for both Malaysians and Filipinos alike.

  • misuari playboy

    Mindanao and sulu are full of natural resources but all taken by philippine government. It is time for all moros and tausogs to halt the philippines colonialism in front of their eyes. They must call a referendum and vote for independence from the philippines rule.

  • joboni96

    pinakamagandang dahilan
    para ipagpatuloy ang laban ng

    sultanato
    tausog
    bangsamoro at
    pilipino

    to benefit from sabah with the sabahans and brunei

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

editors' picks

advertisement
advertisement