Malaysian police name captured ‘royal army’ commander

A+
A
A-

DAVAO CITY – The Malaysian police on Sunday released the identity of the Sulu “royal army” commander, who was captured in Semporna district on Saturday, amid speculations in Sabah he could be Agbimuddin Kiram.

Malaysian police deputy chief Khalid Abu Bakar told a Sabah-based radio station that the arrested commander was Amirbahar Hushin Kiram, 50.

Amirbahar was arrested with his wife, Gina Teves, 47, at a marshy area in Kampung Sri Melor Bugaya around 1:30 a.m. Saturday following a tip-off, Khalid said.

He said seized from the couple were various items such as mobile phones, a money transfer card, cash amounting to over RM3,000 and various documents.

But Khalid would still not name the two other suspects, who were earlier arrested, except for saying one of them was the son of a former Tanduo village chief, who has Filipino ancestry.

He said the arrested suspects would be charged with terrorism and rebellion, or abetting these two acts, before the courts.

Khalid also said the latest arrests had brought to 408 the number of people taken into police custody under Operasi Daulat and over 100 of them were being directly linked to the Feb. 9 Sabah intrusion by the “royal army.”

Since Ops Daulat was launched on March 5, Malaysian security officials said 63 suspected Sulu gunmen had already been killed while the Malaysian side suffered 10 deaths – eight of them policemen.

Out of the number of slain gunmen, Khalid said 38 bodies had been retrieved.

For more than a week now, the Sulu gunmen had not launched any attack against Malaysian security forces on Sabah and the recent skirmishes were prompted by Malaysian ground operation.

Khalid said the main reason was that the “Sulu terrorists” had become leaderless with the arrest of Amirbahar, the death of Commander Musa more than two weeks ago, and when Agbimuddin fled to the Philippines.

But Agbimuddin’s son-in-law, Danilo Datu Abdullah Virtudazo told the Philippine Daily Inquirer in Cagayan de Oro City that the Sulu “royal army” – or what remains of it – was in defensive stance in deference to a ceasefire declared by Sultan Jamalul Kiram III based on a recent letter of appeal from UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.

“The sultanate respected the call for ceasefire but Malaysia did not,” Virtudazo, who is married to Agbimuddin’s fourth daughter, Dayang Mura Napsa, said.

For Malaysian Defense Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, the lack of aggressiveness on the side of Agbimuddin’s men might have been brought about by the fact that their number had been greatly reduced with the high death toll and arrests, their being leaderless, or because they had feared about not getting paid anymore.

“We received similar feedback from the Philippine government that the armed men were paid to carry out the attacks in Sabah,” Ahmad was quoted by state-run Radio 24 as saying on Saturday.

Malaysian Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein said his agency was working closely with Philippine intelligence agencies, such as the National Intelligence Coordinating Agency (Nica), in gathering facts behind the Sabah intrusion.

As Malaysia continues to clamp down on the “royal army,” a descendant of the Sulu royal house – Prof. Rita Tuban of the state-run University of Southeastern Philippines in Davao City – urged Sulu royals to retry the diplomatic way of settling the Sabah claim.

Tuban traces her ancestry from Sultan Jamalul Kiram I (reigned 1823-1842) and is known among Tausugs as Princess Jamala-Rah II.

She said a meeting among Sulu royals should be facilitated by the government so that any peaceful solution agreed would be acceptable to all.

“I think it should be the government to call all the members of the sultanate, just to represent the houses, to unite them in whatever decision they will arrived at on the Sabah claim,” she said.

Prof. Julkipli Wadi of the University of the Philippines had also said during a forum on the Sabah issue, which was organized by Universiti Malaya, on Friday was quoted by state-run media Berita Nasional Malaysia as saying that Malaysia and the Philippines should find ways to immediately resolve the Sabah issue as it could create a larger problem, especially if a third party steps in.

Also speaking during the same forum, Romel Bagares, director of the Manila-based Center for International Law (CenterLaw), warned that the Sabah crisis will eventually have “adverse impacts on security…of the Asean region as a whole.”

“If it escalates, it will not be a Malaysia-Philippines issue anymore. It will cause power imbalance and instability in the region. This is something Asean does not want to happen,” Bagares was quoted as saying.

Prof. Mohamad Abu Bakar, head of the International and Strategic Studies at Universiti Malaya, said in settling the issues, Malaysia and the Philippines should also involve the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) and the heirs of the sultanate of Sulu.

Malacañang has made it clear that the Philippine government will bring the country’s Sabah claim before an international arbiter if evidence could support claims the disputed territory indeed belongs to the Philippines.

Malaysian historian Dr. Khoo Kay Kim said this was welcome development but said he was optimistic that “Malaysia would win the case, based on historical records and evidence which clearly showed that Sabah belonged to Malaysia.”

“All records are in our favor,” Bernama quoted him as saying.

But Malaysian historian Dr. Ranjit Singh, a professor emeritus at the Universiti Utara Malaysia, disagreed on the idea to involve the ICJ over the Sabah issue saying there was no need for Malaysia to argue its case before the international court.

“Apart from historical facts, the Sulu Sultanate and the Philippines had in fact lost their sovereignty rights of Sabah to Malaysia based on the principle of effectivity,” Bernama quoted him as saying.

He said the sultanate has not ruled over Sabah since 1878 until its demise. The Philippines has no basis to claim the territory either because it was never a Sabah administrator.

“If you don’t do anything to it, don’t administer it, don’t pass any law (in that area), you lost that title,” he said, citing the ICJ ruling that favored Singapore on the issue of ownership of Pulau Batu Puteh.

He said the ICJ decided in favor of Singapore even if Malaysia presented a title for the area “because (Malaysia) had never administered or was present physically on the island.” Allan Nawal, Germelina Lacorte and Bobby Lagsa

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • boldyak

    malaysian newspapers always say, the ICJ will decide in favour of malaysia….they keep on saying this…but i am sure, later, they will say…there is no need to go to ICJ because sabah is a part of Malaysia..bwahahahaa…thye know deep inside they will lose the case if the issue will up brought up to ICJ…

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000463788427 Hans Hans

      well just like when Japan don’t want to bring Senkaku Island case to ICJ. by doing that, we show the world there’s nothing to dispute.

      • Alexalbert Mistisma

        HA HA HA…

  • http://www.facebook.com/naldo.dignos Naldo Dignos

    Administration does not imply ownership; as lessee of the leasehold is not an owner. The act of paying rent is an admission of the fact that one is not an owner, he is a renter. Malaysia is paying rent yearly and thus she admits that she is not the owner of Sabah. This is a very simple equation to understand. Malaysia understands it but she refuses to understand it… because of bad intention to consolidate, annex and put Sabah under her souverign territory. Its an overt act of land grabbing.

    • redape

      Are you aware that the Spanish, Americans and the Philippines government have/had treaties with the Sulu Sultanate that involved paying an annual amount in exchange for the sovereignty of the Archipelago. The Sultans heirs insist that these are also “pajak”.

      The only land-grabbing is by the heirs of the original Sultans that granted these Deeds “In Perpetuity” (or in Tausug “Until the Sun and Moon stand in the heavens”). The grant gave the Borneo Company COMPLETE powers – of making laws, taxation, courts, army/navy, police, of the lands and their products… FOREVER. The BNBC could appoint “heirs and assigns” and transfer their rights to any other entity PROVIDED the British Government approved. Not the Sultanate… the British.

      The British acquired the Deed and thus had the right of transfer. Malaysia acquired the sovereignty perfectly legally.

      The “pajak” only refers to the annual fee payment. Not the powers and rights which were complete and permanent. If one is offered a 99-Year leasehold and the deed specifically allows development of the property and transfer of that deed then one may do so. If it’s a 999-Year leasehold then the same applies. It’s essentially “ownership” within that term. The leaseholder cannot “repossess” unless the terms of the lease are violated. Even then there would be specific legal requirements to be followed. According to the Deed it’s the Consul-General of HRH Britannic Government in Labuan that is to adjudicate disputes.

      It’s the heirs of the Sultan who have violated the lease, not the British or the Malaysians. They have probably voided their rights within the deed and that could mean the loss of their rights and privileges to remuneration.

    • Loggnat

      Who and what army will take it away from them? Are you willing to join and die claiming Sabah with that army? for the Sultanate of Sulu, maybe?

  • jacel_itim_na_puso

    sultan great grandfather has made big mistake by giving away sabah in perpetual lease, that means forever… there is nothing for sultan to claim anymore

    • Loggnat

      Malaysia should at least raise the rental payment that is acceptable to the clan of the last sultan of the Sultanate of Sulu as a way for the Tausug to save face. They should also give the royal family of Sulu a special citizenship in exchange for their loyalty to Malaysia which will give them double citizenship if they decide to keep their citizenship to the Philippines. Malaysia will also be able to subject the royal clan of Sulu to their law if they ever decided to reside in Malaysia. The Philippines should renounce the claim to Sabah in exchange of Malaysia’s total support of the Philippines in it’s claim of Panatag and other islands inside its economic zone in the international court against China’s claim. I’m sure that the Malaysian government is uneasy of China being that close to their border. Who knows, China might dig up or magically come up with some ancient map showing some islands off Malaysian coast as part of China and we know what will happen then. China will claim them of course. Both nations should stick together to keep China away from our coast.

      • jacel_itim_na_puso

        Sir, the problem with our claim on Sabah is that there has never been a rental payment (Madrid protocol). Malaysia is giving a token to the heirs of the sultan as a goodwill gesture. With Jamalul Kiram hostile attitude, I dont think Malaysia will continue the goodwill token any more.

      • Loggnat

        A plausible solution will be what I posted above accomplished with peaceful cooperation, recognition, and respect to and by all parties involved, More bloodshed and bad blood is not a logical option plus a lasting peace and stability will accelerate and enhance any development and progress in the region. Bloodshed and instability assures an opposite effect.

  • kilabot

    the tausugs had never been colonized.
    they will stay and remain as a tribe;
    on the other hand, malasia had been colonized by the brits;
    in fact, a true malasian does not exist;
    the malasians now are in reality british bastards;
    a country of bastards won’t last long.

    • jacel_itim_na_puso

      Sir, the time when the stonger clan rules over the weaker people is down with history. We are now living in the 21st century. People do not care about tausug warriors anymore. What the Tausugs need badly is to throw away their ancestral pride and move on with time. War is a disease that will only put the whole tausug race into oblivion.

  • http://www.facebook.com/suhaimi.talib.547 Suhaimi Talib

    Today Jamlul Kiram has no choice but to admit DEFEAT ….regret to say that he had send many of his relatives to the graves….for nothing…

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

editors' picks

advertisement
advertisement