Aquino stands by UN arbitration of dispute with China


President Benigno Aquino addresses the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Malacañang Photo Bureau

DAVOS, Switzerland—President Benigno Aquino stood firm on the Philippines’ decision to seek United Nations arbitration of its territorial dispute with China, saying this action was backed by a consensus among the three branches of government.

In a chat with  Philippine journalists on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum annual meeting, Aquino shrugged off concerns that taking the arbitration route would complicate gas exploration activities in the West Philippine Sea, as the Manila government calls part of the South China Sea that it claims to be part of Philippine territory.

Aquino was specifically asked about the concern aired by businessman Manuel V. Pangilinan, chair of Philex Petroleum Corp. which is in talks with the state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp. (CNOOC) on Recto Bank gas exploration subject to a framework acceptable to both the Philippine and Chinese governments.

In the first place, Aquino said, the partnership offer of CNOOC to Pangilinan’s group was still at a very early stage.

Secondly, the President said, the Philippines had justifiable reasons to take the arbitration route given recurring incidents of intrusion by Chinese vessels into Philippine seas. The President cited two separate maritime incidents in Bajo de Masinloc. ‘

Based on affidavits shown to him, the President said, two Chinese vessels were just about 10 yards away from the demarcation line.

“And when you’re talking about ships, they don’t have brakes, right? Ten yards is just too close. While they were approaching, their horns were at full blast,” Mr. Aquino said.

On incident No. 2, the allegation of the affiant was that while sheltering inside Bajo de Masinloc, they were “observed,” and eventually approached and ordered out of the shoal when they were taking shelter from rough waters, the President said.

Citing the affidavit, the President said the Filipino vessels were told to go back to the rough waters even as Bajo de Masinloc, under UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea), was part of of the country’s exclusive economic zone .

“So I think the record is very clear. From the incident in Bajo de Masinloc, we have tried to de-escalate the situation. We have tried to adhere to all of their request…. And instead of a de-escalation, there seems to be an escalation on their end,” the President said.

“With all due respect to Mr. Pangilinan, what am I supposed to do? I consulted the leadership of both chambers of Houses, both chambers, to include the minority leadership of both and (they were) okay,” he said.

Before taking this route, Mr. Aquino said the Executive branch invited the judiciary, which unfortunately was in an en banc session on the day a meeting was called on the issue.

The President said even past presidents like Fidel V. Ramos and Joseph Estrada were invited to share their experiences. “So we brought the matter before them and there was unanimity. I won’t exaggerate, but really, nobody objected to going into this arbitration mode. I think, the choice is very, very clear,” Aquino said.

One option for the Philippines is to let the status quo remain whereas China was claiming effective control over Bajo de Masinloc and ordering Philippine vessels out.

“And if we don’t do this approach then, what is the next step? Is it Reed Bank next or Recto Bank? What else? We’ve been, I think, very patient. We believe we’ve been complying with the request in the interest of maintaining good relations but unfortunately, there has been no reciprocation. Hence, I am, by workings of the Constitution, and by the oath that I undertook, I swore to defend this country, and we are doing this under international law, in a peaceful manner” he said.

Aquino said the Philippines was not trying to threaten anybody. “But if we don’t stand up for our rights, who we do expect will be standing up for our rights?” he said.

But Pangilinan, in a statement, aired what he said was a very practical and moral question: “Are you prepared to set aside, but not surrender, your claim on sovereignty over the area, so you could go on and develop the area jointly or should you stick to the moral position that this is ours and no matter what happens this is ours? In which case, quite likely, it will never be developed, at least not in our lifetime.”

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • reena aneer

    To IRIS,

    OK, but I’m referring to an exclusive economic zone extends from the outer limit of the territorial sea to a maximum of 200 nautical miles (370.4 km) from the territorial sea baseline. So what is 200 nautical miles, is it a distance or height?

    Bilateral talks? How many times did Philippines government have gone through this diplomatic scheme and yet China is still insisting and claiming that Scarborough Shoal belong to their territory?

    No more bilateral talks, let the UN decides and solves these issues.

    God Bless the PHILIPPINES! (:

    • Iris

       All UN can do is to help PH and China to talk each other.

       Negotiation is never easy but that is what diplomats are paid to do.

  • reena aneer

    Anyway, God bless also China…

    I do have a lot of Chinese friends here. They are all nice and friendly. We do not talk about these issues. We are more on friendship! (:

    • Iris

      God bless PH too.

       I have Philippine relatives and friends. They are really nice. Can you imagine that they can let you drive their cars ? I am serious.  All my friends would never let me drive their cars except Filipinos and Filipina, the most friendly people.

  • Val Sor

    Doris Dumlao you are weak-minded.  Would you suffer the loss of a limb of a loved one? So it is with loving a motherland — we protect its borders with our lives. To think otherwise, in your heart, you have already committed treason. Have you even tried boycotting made in China products as a personal life-long committment? If not, how dare you write an article that touches Philippine sovereignty which is a sensitive topic to those who love the country?

  • balimbing

    Honorable President Aquino, most Filipinos and I am of them who STRONGLY support your decision to seek United Nation arbitration of its territotial dispute with China. Next, offers of Manuel V. Pangilinan and CNOOC must be cancelled. Primarily Chinese are the most untrusted person here on earth so never ever to deal with them. In God blessing there will be new investor.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks




latest videos