Quantcast

The Artist Abroad

Brothers under the skin

By |


NEW YORK – This November 30th marks the 149th birth anniversary of Andres Bonifacio, the charismatic founder of the Kataas-taasang Kagalanggalangang Katipunan ng Mga Anak ng Bayan (KKK, or the Highest, Most Honorable Society of the Country’s Sons and Daughters). Tondo-born, working-class Bonifacio, an admirer of the upper-class ilustrado José Rizal, only two years his senior, had joined La Liga Filipina (the Philippine League), which the latter had formed in 1892, shortly after his return from Europe. Rizal meant to disseminate through La Liga what the Propaganda Movement had been advocating in Spain: the unification of the archipelago politically and culturally; a more methodical development of agriculture, education, and industry; and the eradication of injustice. These reformist goals were to be pursued in a nonviolent manner. But despite the fact that these stated objectives could hardly be seen as radical—there was no mention of forming a state independent of the Spanish—the very fact that it had been founded by Rizal, whom the friars hated virulently, was enough to doom it. Just four days after the initial meeting of La Liga, Rizal was arrested and subsequently exiled on July 15, 1892, to Dapitan, in northwestern Mindanao.

For a while, Bonifacio actively recruited members for the League. Fearful, however, that the recruits brought in by the warehouseman—Bonifacio was employed by a British trading firm—saw armed revolution as the only path forward, the remaining leaders of La Liga dissolved the organization. Thus, from its ashes sprang the Katipunan.

Not only was Bonifacio familiar with Rizal’s novels, Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo, he had also read Victor Hugo’s Les Miserables, Eugene Sue’s The Wandering Jew, as well as texts on the French Revolution and international law. Inspired doubtless by the advocacy of liberté, egalité and fraternité through the barrel of a gun (and the guillotine), and the subsequent overthrow of the long-entrenched monarchical order, Bonifacio envisioned a similar scenario in getting rid of the tyrannical Spanish. Yes, he deeply admired and respected Rizal but he saw how the man had been treated by the colonial state—most likely the turning point that made him take the path Rizal had forsworn. The KKK would be the irresistible catalyst that would put an end to Iberian despotism, friar abuse, and establish a new and independent nation.

Though Bonifacio did launch the revolution in August of 1896, he didn’t live to see the Spanish give up their colony and the ensuing 1899 Philippine-American War. Having lost his position as Supremo as a result of a power struggle with Aguinaldo and his followers, Bonifacio and his brother Procopio were found guilty of treason by a military court controlled by their now-sworn enemies and executed in the woods of Mt. Buntis on May 10, 1897. His widow Gregoria de Jesus somehow evaded capture and returned to Manila where she wed Julio Nakpil, a Katipunan officer loyal to her late husband.

The commemoration of Bonifacio’s birth will no doubt witness a vigorous debate yet again as to who should be preeminent in our esteem: Rizal or Bonifacio. The latter is put forward in many ways as the anti-Rizal: a nationalist working-class firebrand willing to risk all to attain freedom, consequences be damned, as opposed to the measured intellectual assessment of the former, a privileged member of indio society. While this debate does throw up interesting points well worth pondering, in the long run, it is at heart a false one. Is our esteem so limited that to honor one is to necessarily exclude the other? An absurd proposition but one that in fact continues to be advanced to this day.

Both men gave their lives for a greater cause. Both men knew and respected each other, though at that point Rizal was the more celebrated and influential of the two. In acknowledgement,

Bonifacio sent an emissary, Dr. Pio Valenzuela, to Dapitan to seek Dr. Rizal’s advice, and his blessing for the armed revolution that was being planned. Rizal thought the timing wasn’t right and therefore, not wishing the blood of Filipinos on his conscience, advised against it. The Katipunan chief was sorely disappointed but this didn’t seem to lessen the esteem in which he held the exile, one proof of this being the continued use of “Rizal” as a Katipunan password.

Instead of an either/or framework, let us instead reimagine the two as the impoverished Elias and the wealthy Ibarra, in Rizal’s Noli, who carry on a debate over the justification of violent actions against the state, which Elias favors and Ibarra argues against. At the end of the novel, Elìas sacrifices his life that Ibarra may live. By the time we meet Ibarra again in the Fili (really a sequel to the Noli), he has changed his tune completely and now seeks the violent overthrow of the state.

It’s almost as though life were imitating art. Just as one cannot think of Ibarra without thinking of Elìas, and vice versa, similarly, to contemplate the 1896 Revolution is to see the lives of Rizal and Bonifacio intertwined. To honor one is to also honor the other.


Follow Us




More from this Blog:



Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Short URL: http://globalnation.inquirer.net/?p=58343

  • joboni96

    coup ang ginawa ni aguinaldo
    kontra kay bonifacio

    brains of rizal
    courage of bonifacio
    organization of aguinaldo

    all needed for national defense
    of our kalayaan and eez

  • opinyonlangpo

    As with the present day politics, Bonifacio was ordered assasinated by Aguinaldo. An example of divisive Filipino leadership, the reason why elected officials finish their term defending their position and their pocket from fellow officials.

  • tra6Gpeche

    The generation of Dr. Jose P. Rizal and Gat Andres Bonifacio should be very honored for having both of them. The generation of Filipinos after Rizal and Bonifacio’s has really nothing to be proud of. So the talk on who is better between the two should be considered nonsense and petty!

  • kanoy

    I highly doubt that Dr. Jose P. Rizal and Gat Andres Bonifacio would be pleased or even agree our keeping our children out of school and thus losing another unrecoverable day of education to ”celebrate” their birthdays…I think that Rizal, Bonifacio,Rizal and Aguinaldo even toss in Lapu-Lapu would all have been satisfied with HERO’S DAY

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XXMVC66BK2NJINS3UEVPU7UDNM Joe

      I completely disagree. Although we have great heroes deserving of recognition for their sacrifices for our country, there are those whose contributions are more outstanding than others as exemplified by Jose Rizal and Andres Bonifacio. It is much like a search for the best this or that where the trophy is awarded to the most outstanding among the nominees.
      I might add that Macario Sakay, who was unjustly maligned as a bandit  in our history books that was written under the supervision of our American colonizers, deserves more than the Senate Resolution of 2008 that finally recognized his heroism, and a statue in his honor at Plaza Moraga, Tondo built on the same year. He deserves to be held in great esteem as Rizal and Bonifacio.  He was the last general (not Miguel Malvar) who surrendered to the Americans in 1906. The Americans tried every trick in the book to capture him, including hamleting that resulted in the death of thousands of innocent civilians from hunger and decease, but to no avail.  Only after he was deceived, lied to with promises of independence and amnesty and treachery by white men who spoke with forked tongue, were they able to capture him.

      These three great patriots, Jose Rizal, Andres Bonifacio and Macario Sakay deserve more than just the monuments an statues built in their honor.  More effective memorials are necessary that will always keep the memory of  these three great men in the consciousness of our people for all generations.  And what better way to do this than having our major highways, current and future, that span our country being named after them.

       

      • kanoy

         Its your right to disagree, if you feel that your children benefit from holidays we celebrate not once, but twice, more power to you, me? i don’t pay for my kids to have holidays that they would benefit more by being in school studying about the man the holiday represents, rather than sitting at home watching the idiot box and the last thing on their mind is Rizal, Aguinaldo, Bonefacio….our doctors in many cases are lucky to pass as nurses our lawyers as summons servers OFW sure they can qualify here for the chump change pay….after they clear all the red tape,,,if they do,,,,it costs the avg nurse p500k to work OFW the family goes into hock…my P100K per yr per child X3 says 1 holiday to celebrate all the heros as one and keep the kids in school on the heros birthdays as the US does Lincoln and Washington teaching the kids who they where and what they did gives me more bang for my buck and helps the kids more than wow wow wee



Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement
Advertisement
Marketplace