Quantcast
Latest Stories

The people’s comments and why the Impeachment Court should ignore the Supreme Court

By

“Siguradong limpak limpak  na dolyar ang tinatago nitong si Corona!” (“For sure, Corona is hiding tons of dollars.”)

Anthony, a care home owner in the San Francisco Bay Area, home to hundreds of thousands of Filipinos -  was reacting to the Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) issued by the Philippine Supreme Court against the subpoena issued by the Senate Impeachment Court on the dollar accounts of Corona.

Thanks to ABS CBN TV, Filipinos worldwide get real time live full coverage of the impeachment proceedings. For sure,  the following real comments on the trial are heard globally. These comments express the people’s sentiments. They tell us much.

Here they are:

Comment 1: “Kung walang tinatago iyan, e di dapat matutuwa pa siyang ilabas ang kanyang  mga ari-arian at bank accounts para mapakita niya na hindi siya magnanakaw.”
(“If he has nothing to hide, he should be happy to reveal his properties and bank accounts to prove he is not a thief.”)

Comment 2: “Iyong mga nadiscobre na ari-arian at peso bank account niya, milyon milyon na ang halaga, ano pa kaya iyong ibang ari-arian at dolyar na bank account  niya na hindi nadiscobre.”
(“Those discovered real properties and peso bank accounts  belonging to him already amounts to several millions. . How much more of those properties and dollar accounts not discovered?”)

Comment 3: “Palagay ko napaka daming  kwarta at ari-arian pa iyan na nasa pangalan ng mga kamaganak at kaibigan. Madami pang deposito at ariarian sa Amerika at Hongkong. Ganyan ang gawain ng ating mga magnanakaw na opisyales.”
(“I bet he has so much more cash and properties in the names of relatives and friends. He probably has more cash deposits and properties in Hong Kong and America. These are the ways of our crooked officials.”)

Comment 4: “Napakalinaw sa mga tao na ang trabajo noong abugado ni Corona na si tatang Cuevas ay ipagtakpan ang mga ari-arian at mga milyon milyon na salapi ni Corona. Ha-nga rin ako kay tatang dahil matalas pa rin ang utak at  dila at maraming ebidensya ng prosecution na napigil niya ang pagpasok. Pero madami pa rin ang mabibigat na ebidensiya ang nakapasok na hindi  niya napigilan,  kaya patay na si Corona.”

(“It’s very clear to the people that the objective of Corona’s aging lawyer Cuevas is to keep his millions from being discovered. I’m impressed by the old guy as he still has a sharp mind and tongue and was able to keep much evidence from being admitted. But still, much damaging evidence has already been submitted which he was not able to prevent, that’s why Corona is dead.”)

Comment 5:  ”Salamat na lang  na nandiyan etong mga Senador na gustong ibulatlat ang katotohanan sa madlang tao gaya nila Senador Drilon, Osmena, Pangilinan, Cayetano. Hindi kamukha nila Senador Arroyo, Escudero at Senadora Defensor na ayaw lumabas ang katotohanan.”

(“Thank heavens some Senators want the truth to be revealed like Drilon, Osmena, Pangilinan and Cayetano. Not like Senators Arroyo, Escudero and Defensor who do not want the truth to be exposed.”)

Comment 6: “Sino pa ba naman na tao na matuwid ang isipin ang mag gugusto pa na magtuloy na Chief Justice si Corona? Bistado na ang kadiliman ng kanyang kaluluwa?”

(“Which person with an honest mind would still want Corona to continue on as Chief Justice? The darkness of his soul is now exposed.”)

Comment 7: “Napakalinaw at napakagarapal ang kalokohan na ginagawa ng mga Justicia na ka tropa ni Corona. Gusto nilang huwag mabulgar sa mga tao ang katakot takot na kinurakot ng kanilang hepe.  Kung ano anong rason ang binibigay kung bakit daw hindi puedeng ilabas ito kaya nag labas ng TRO. Maloloko ba naman nila ang mga tao.”

(“The wrongdoings of these crony Justices of Corona are  quite clear and blatant. They want to hide the enormous amount of corruption money their chief took.  They give all kinds of reasons why these cannot be revealed and issued a TRO. They cannot fool the people.”)

Comment 8: “Tama itong si Congressman Farinas. May yagbols ito. Sabi niya dapat inbestigahin at impeach din iyan mga Justicia na iyan. Mamahalin siya ng taong bayan pag mangyari iyan. Kailangan na talagang linisin ang ating bayan. Kawawa ang mga Pilipino na talagang sobra nang naghihirap dahil sa kurakot.”

(“Congressman Farinas  is right. He’s got balls. He said these Justices should be investigated and also impeached. The people will love him if this happens. It’s really time to clean up the country. Pity Filipinos who are really suffering much because of corruption.”

Comment 9: “Gusto ko talagang ma-impeach si Corona pero sa palagay ko baka hindi mangyayari. Pinapag-aralan ko iyong mga Senador at ang tingin ko may apat  dito  na kampi kay former President Arroyo at iyong ibang apat pa ay may galit kay Aquino o di kaya malamang mainganyong sumama sa campo ni Arroyo.”
(“I really want for Corona to be impeached but it might not happen. I’m analyzing the Senators and I think four of them are on the side of former President Arroyo and another four either have axes to grind against Aquino or else might likely be persuaded to join the Arroyo camp.”

Note: Two comments were made that were not supportive of impeaching Corona but not because they like Corona. One was made by a Villar supporter in the last elections, the other a relative of a corrupt official. Their comments:

Comment 10: “Bumabawi lang iyan si PNoy dahil tinangal sa pamilya niya iyong Hacienda Luisita.”
(“PNoy is doing this (impeachment) for revenge because Hacienda Luisita was taken from his family.”)

Comment 11: “Sa talaga, lahat naman ng opisyales sa ating bayan gumagawa ng kwarta, pabayaan na natin itong impeachment na ito.”

(“Anyway, all the officials in our country are making money, let’s just forget this impeachment thing.”)
Aside from the Supreme Court’s (TRO) against the Impeachment Court’s subpoena of Corona’s dollar accounts, Corona has also requested another TRO – requesting that the impeachment trial be stopped. The request is still pending.

Should the Senate Impeachment Court obey the Supreme Court?

Here’s my take on this:

The rational for the Constitution instituting a Senate Impeachment Court is to provide a mechanism to remove certain high ranking officials such as the President, Vice President, Supreme Court Justices, etc.

No other entity is given the authority or power of trying specified officials to remove them from office except the Senate Impeachment Court.

It should be obvious and logical that the Supreme Court should not have the power nor authority to order or tell the Impeachment Court what to do. Otherwise it would be superior to the Impeachment Court. The Justices might as well do the impeachment trials for the specified officials themselves if they have this power or authority since that would mean that they have the final say. This is not what the Constitution intended.

By issuing a TRO against a subpoena order of the Senate Impeachment Court, the majority of Justices show: no respect to the Senate Impeachment Court, no respect to the Senators, no respect to the people and no respect for the Constitution. Again, seven Justices have shown their propensity to engage in judicial abuse and tyranny. Ironically, an eight Judge is an Aquino appointee. Either he has joined the cabal of conspiring Arroyo appointed Justices for whatever reason or genuinely believes that the Supreme Court can order the Impeachment Court on what to do and that it is justified in doing so.

In good faith, Presiding Senator Juan Ponce Enrile and the Senator-Judges have shown respect for the Supreme Court as an institution. They denied the prosecution’s request to subpoena four Justices. They could have if they wanted to – but out of sensitivity and notions of equality of powers principles, they decided not to. Apparently, the Senator-Judges showed respect to the Justices but eight Justices did not show respect to them. Five dissenting Justices did.

The eight Justices are not dumb. They know that if Corona’s dollar accounts were exposed, the likelihood is that it might  show hundreds of thousands of dollars from unexplained sources including the $700,000 from one account alone as claimed by the prosecutors.

As Justices, one would think that of any group of people, they should be the ones most concerned about the truth and about having a squeaky clean Chief Justice with unquestionable integrity. They owe this to the people, to themselves and above all – to their Creator.

And if Corona were in good faith, he should have been the first to stop his colleagues from issuing a TRO.  He should have in fact insisted that his dollar accounts be revealed to prove his innocence.

The Impeachment Court should absolutely ignore the  orders of the Supreme Court – whether it is the TRO on revealing Corona’s dollar accounts, an order to stop the impeachment trial of Corona or any other order. The Senators should not even consider filing a Motion to Reconsider. Doing so means recognizing and accepting that the Supreme Court has authority over the Impeachment Court.

There is no constitutional crisis involved here. These unpalatable orders issued by eight Justices, if obeyed,  effectively protects Corona’s dollar accounts  from exposure concealing high crimes against the people.  The Supreme Court exists primarily to protect the interests of the people – not that of an alleged erring Chief Justice facing impeachment.  It is of paramount importance to the nation to have a Chief Justice with unquestionable honesty. He sets the example for all the Justices and judges. Disobeying the eight Justices in this situation is not the same as disrespecting the Supreme Court. It is  right  to disobey an order when it is immoral. Moreover, the Supreme Court has no legitimate authority over the Senate Impeachment Court.

What will the Supreme Court do if the Impeachment Court disobeys? Hold the Senator-Judges in contempt? Who will arrest the Senators? The bailiffs? The police? The sheriffs? Not any of these will happen? So much for all of these undefined warnings about Constitutional crisis issued by some alarmists.

Finally, Arroyo and Corona supporters rant that revealing Corona’s peso and dollar accounts would cause a bank run. Obviously, by using this fear mongering tactic and playing on public anxiety, they hope  to keep Corona’s dollars  from being revealed. But – why should a depositor be concerned when  there is no case against him? Neither the government nor the bank is about to take a depositor’s money without a court order.

In the U.S. and other advanced nations, bank secrecy laws are tempered by reason and sound public policy. When criminal activity and/or public interest is involved, reason dictates that bank accounts be revealed. In fact, The Philippine Money Laundering Act of 2001 already provides for revealing questionable deposits. Are the majority of Supreme Court Justices being iintentionally ignorant of this law? The Senator-Judges should use this law to effectively force Corona to reveal all of his accounts – dollars or otherwise.

Note: San Francisco based Atty.  Ted Laguatan is honored by the California State Bar as one of only 29 US lawyers continuously certified as Expert-Specialists in Immigration Law for more than 20 years. He also does human rights and complex litigation cases involving accidents and wrongful death. Tel 650 991- 1154 email laguatanlaw@gmail.com

More from this Blog:

Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: Corona Impeachment , Government , Judiciary , Politics , Renato Corona , Supreme Court , US

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.
  • Anonymous

    Disclosure of dollar deposits of suspected corrupt officials will never cause a bank run or fear to foreign investors. In fact it will be good for our country & banking system. Disallowing it only confrms that there are many unexplained wealth of our government officials deposited as dollars knowing that its untouchable. So any corrupt official will just convert his/her forbidden fruits into dollars & deposit it in any bank. If there is a law prohibiting the disclosure of dollar deposits to suspected corrupt or criminal officials, then this law was made for the protection of these corrupt & criminal elements of our society, not the public in general. Therefore, it seems our very own Supreme Court is protecting them? No wonder we don’t prosper as a nation.

    • http://twitter.com/MarLouWang Marlou Wang

      Baligtad kasi ang mga utak ng ayaw i-disclose yung mga dollar ni Thief Justice. Buong palagay ko yung mga kumakampi sa Thief J. na ito may malaking kurakot din.

  • isan chiu

    ngayon palang, gumawa na tayo ng listahan ng mga ibobotong, senador, panahon na palitan ang mga, walang pakinabang at tililing.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/CD363KESHISQ73WMKIDDYEDYRM Tagumpay

      CORRECT KA DJAN…. UMPISAHAN MO… PUBLISH MO SA GANITO AND THEN WE CAN ADD…

      TO VOTE
      PUT NO.1 NEIL TUPAS

      TO UNSEAT
      PUT NO.1 MIRIAM BRENDA SANTIAGO

  • Roland Gallinera

    Bobong supreme court, based on the SALN of CJ, those dollar deposits are “not” his money, so they cannot give out a TRO for defending CJ of his “rights” to secrecy or the supposed bank accounts which is “not” his in the first place. They should automatically sequester that money as CJ has “relinquished” ownership of said bank deposits when he did not declare them in his SALN… I find the Philippine courts stupid for not knowing this fact, as the SALN already has declared what properties and monies he owns, and those not declared, already means that the CJ does not own them and hence, and thus should be subject to ownership evaluation proceedings… if no other owners contest the ownership, then it should automatically forfeited.

    Either that or CJ should be cited for perjury for misdeclaring his SALN.

    • http://twitter.com/MarLouWang Marlou Wang

      I agree with you, not only stupid, very very stupid!!!

  • Anonymous

    What I understand is that laws are basically designed to protect the public. Where there is a conflict between the public’s interest and that of private interest, the former should prevail. Kaya, bakit kailangan magtago sa banking secrecy law? Dinisinyo ba ang banking secrecy law para maitago ang money laundering schemes?
    Mr. Chief Justice shouldn’t you be the example of transparency?

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/CD363KESHISQ73WMKIDDYEDYRM Tagumpay

    PLEASE FORWARD THIS ARTICLE FOR THE IMPEACHMENT COURT TO READ.

    PATHETIC THEY ARE. Even a cigarette vendor, a street sweeper or a streetchild can TELL the SC which corona heads has NO MORAL Authority to issue or even tamper with the impeachment court  BUT THE senators CHOSE to honor them!

    that is BLASPHEMY! AND THEY ARE BLASPHEMIZING THEMSELVES FOR EVEN GIVING A THOUGHT ABOUT THE SC TRO much more follow it!!!

    The PEOPLE KNOW, THEY ARE ALSO AFRAID OF GOING TO BE THE NEXT ONE TO BE SCRUTINIZED, EACH ONE OF THEM. so the 13 who voted to STOP the DOLLAR ACCOUNT INVESTIGATION— more likely have SPURIOUS DOLLAR ACCOUNT THEMSELVES….

    Your guess is as good as mine, as they say.

    SO WE RESORT TO PRAYING TO ALMIGHTY GOD THAT THE BETTER SENSE OF THESE SENATORS PREVAIL—-  AS ONLY THEIR HEROIC SACRIFICE OF UNCOVERING THE TRUTH, EVEN ABOUT THEMSELVES LATER, WILL SAVE THIS COUNTRY, WHICH IS THEIRS ALSO FROM ala syria scenario and for them to be ala-qadaffyed.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_22PRRPV4XKOOIC5TBS2ZLT7PZQ Tirador Ngbuwaya

    Kahit na pagalitan pa ni Miriam araw – araw  ang mga prosecutors  at araw-araw ding magpakitang gilas  si matandang Cuevas sa galing nya  sa  Rules of  Court, WALA  RING  SAYSAY YAN, AYAW  DIN  NG TAONG BAYAN !  ANG NAIS  NG TAONG BAYAN  AY MALAMAN  ANG  KATOTOHANAN  SA MGA NAKATAGONG YAMAN  NI CORONA! Sa ngayon, galit na galit na ang taong bayan dyan sa mga abogado ng depensa ni Corona. . .dahil pilit nilang itinatago ang katotohanan. . . gumagamit ng  delaying tactics at   ngayon gusto nilang ipatigil ang impeachment proceedings dahil alam nila na matatalo na sila. . .

  • Anonymous

     If we base the decision on the comments of the common Filipino then i think we can dissolve the Supreme Court. Why bother with a court if we are to follow the voice of the majority instead of the rule of law? Better yet might as well throw that piece of paper called the constitution in the garbage also since we are going to follow the mob rule

    • Anonymous

      pare, the senate court is not a criminal-civil court, it is a political exercise permitted in the Constitution to remove an erring impeachable officials, with simple betrayal of public trust. according to the Ph Constitution; you do not need to prove beyond reasonable doubt, and the senators are the “voices” of the people having their mandates derived from them, ok?
      it is a political process, don’t confuse your “law school” with it, in fact, sen Lito lapid should not “qualify” as senator-judge, if it  is a legal court, tsk, tsk, tsk!

      • Anonymous

        But you forget the SC is the final interpreter of the law not the senate. That is stated in the constitution.

  • Anonymous

    ted leguatan’s concern are founded on wise legal opinion, but, these Ph senators-judges are not looking for the “truth”, they’re looking for gold mines, he, he, he! it is rumored that the corrupt glo arroyo have poured out millions of pesos from her “loot” whilst 9 years in malacanang, to support the corrupt corona, tsk, tsk, tsk!  money will play a big game in this trial, stocking up for the coming 2013 election to buy “votes” to win in the senate race, tsk, tsk, tsk! that is Ph politics, never change, the “votes” are for sale!

  • Anonymous

    Why is the President so obsessed with one person when millions of his people are dying everyday.. seems to be someone powerful is behind this…

    If you want find corrupt people, there are tons of them in the senate, congress and the government…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Dennis-Yanos/100003583571069 Dennis Yanos

    The issue is very simple. I do not know why lawyers and all those who profess to know the law including the very animals who drafted the Philippine Constitution are having trouble seeing what is right from wrong, what need, and need not be done.  Consider these:
    1.  The Constitution is not perfect. It is stuffed with vulnerabilities serving only the interests of those in power.  Bill of Rights?  What?  Where? When? and How?
    2.  Congress (senate and house of representatives) and the Supreme Court are packed with self serving and greedy monsters.  Do you really expect anyone of them to care what happens to Juan dela Cruz?  Since when?
    3.  This is the sad part:  The poor electorate, having voted demons and monsters in government elective posts, appoints thieves, and would be demons and monsters, and would wait for a matter of time before they get entangled with each other on the loot.  So why go to the voting pecincts during elections?



Copyright 2011 . All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement
  1. Philippines to receive 10 new patrol ships from Japan
  2. Discarded draft of Corona’s opening statement found?
  3. Honesty pays (P50,000) for airport cleaner
  4. Panamanian national in Filipina rape case claims ‘consensual sex’
  5. It’s official: Plane tickets will include terminal fees
  6. Japan eyes maritime aid for Philippine defense
  7. Philippines stops protest trip to shoal disputed with China
  8. Philippines willing to share Spratlys bounty – Aquino
  9. Philippines may buy fighters other than US
  10. Int’l body allows Philippines access to protected Pacific fishing grounds
  1. Nuclear-powered ‘fast-attack’ US submarine docks in Subic
  2. Anastasia long dead, say experts
  3. Boracay resorts hit by cancellations from Chinese tourists
  4. Loida Lewis to China: ‘You’re shameless’
  5. Japan eyes maritime aid for Philippine defense
  6. Philippines to receive 10 new patrol ships from Japan
  7. China ‘notices’ PH diplomatic gesture in maritime dispute
  8. Philippines may buy fighters other than US
  9. DFA execs grilled on immunity of Panamanian rape suspect
  10. Panamanian national in Filipina rape case claims ‘consensual sex’
  1. Scarborough belongs to PH, old maps show
  2. China warned against deploying more ships
  3. China deploys gunboat
  4. China daily warns of ‘small-scale war’ with Philippines
  5. China won’t be allowed to conquer Scarborough, says military official
  6. China TV ‘claims’ Philippines as Chinese territory
  7. Aquino: These are our waters
  8. US Seventh Fleet flagship arrives in Manila
  9. Sison chides China for ‘absurd’ Panatag claim
  10. Philippines ignores China demand to quit shoal

News

  • Basa-Guidote: A story of betrayal in the family
  • Iglesia ni Cristo lobby doubted
  • G-8 leaders put focus on European financial crisis
  • 4 teens killed in car crash
  • Painter-activist seeks volunteers for ‘Wall of Nature’
  • Sports

  • Ireland’s Taylor retains world title
  • UE stuns La Salle in Filoil Preseason Cup
  • Mbe nails game-winner as NU escapes Adamson at Filoil Preseason Cup
  • Olympic torch relay starts in Britain
  • La Salle Zobel torches Emilio Aguinaldo College in Filoil sports event
  • Lifestyle

  • German baritone opera singer Fischer-Dieskau dead
  • Who’s Leviticus? Pacquiao says sorry to gays
  • Appeals court affirms libel conviction filed by Ricky Reyes vs publisher
  • ‘Black’ is back
  • Liam Cunningham delves into Davos
  • Entertainment

  • LaBeouf returns to Cannes, this time with pride
  • Lady Gaga arrives in Manila
  • Jessica’s got it
  • Gay partner traumatizes star
  • Joyce of summer
  • Business

  • Family turns rest house into lucrative tourism site
  • Filipino Silicon Valley veterans give back
  • Down in Dauin lives a wealthy goatherd
  • Greece tops G8 agenda as eurozone crisis snares Spain
  • Facebook stock closes nearly flat in debut
  • Technology

  • Globe launches Samsung Galaxy S III; online pre-orders start May 23
  • Motorola Mobility smartphones face US import ban
  • App-Pinoy: Check out these fun and handy homegrown apps for your device
  • Reports: HP poised to eliminate up to 30,000 jobs
  • PH still on US ‘watch list’ for counterfeit goods
  • Opinion

  • Time for Tim
  • Corona’s word
  • Will Corona testify?
  • Nothing ‘gay’ about hate crimes
  • My name is Tulfo (as told to Patricia Evangelista)
  • Global Nation

  • Facing up to discrimination
  • Seeking spousal support when a marriage ends
  • OFW loses job because baby can’t finish bottle of milk
  • UN hails Philippine peacekeepers at Golan Heights
  • Photos of kissing between Filipina, Panamanian don’t disprove rape, says Sotto
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    © Copyright 1997-2011 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved