Quantcast
Latest Stories

Philippines keen on stronger US presence

By ,

‘GOOD NEIGHBORS ON THE BLOCK’. Members of the United States and Philippine Coast Guards stand together during the closing ceremony of the Maritime Law Enforcement Instructors Development Course at the PCG Headquarters in Manila on Friday. Stronger US presence is here. NIÑO JESUS ORBETA

MANILA, Philippines—Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario on Friday said the Philippines would accept an increased United States military presence in the country 20 years after kicking out the last US military base from its territory, but stressed that this would be in accordance with Philippine law which bans the basing of foreign troops.

Increased military presence could include more and more frequent joint exercises and a greater number of US troops rotating through the country, Del Rosario said in a press statement.

“It is to our definite advantage to be exploring how to maximize our treaty alliance with the United States in ways that would be mutually acceptable and beneficial,” Del Rosario said in a statement.

Del Rosario’s comments expanded on comments by Philippine defense and military officials who confirmed on Thursday a Washington Post report that the US and the Philippines were in talks about expanding bilateral military cooperation as the Philippines grapples with the growing assertiveness of China.

But Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin said any agreement would not extend to the permanent basing of US troops.

Gazmin on Friday said an expanded US military presence in the region should raise the Philippines’ capability to deter border intrusions.

“I would rather look at it from the positive point of view, that there would be stability in the region, that we would have enough deterrent,” he told reporters.

“Without a deterrent force, we can be easily pushed around, our territories will be violated. Now that we have a good neighbor on the block, we can no longer be bullied,” he said, referring to the US.

Complement diplomacy

Del Rosario did not specifically mention China as driving the Philippines’ push for a greater US military presence, but highlighted “territorial disputes” in his statement.

He said closer military relations with the US would “complement” the diplomatic approach the country has been taking to the threats it is facing.

“If there could be the possibility of threats to our national interest in terms of, say, territorial disputes, we should be prepared to deal with these issues diplomatically. To complement the diplomatic approach we must at the very least also endeavor to achieve a minimum credible defense posture,” he explained.

As the Philippines’ treaty ally, Del Rosario said the US “has offered to help us.”

Beyond responding to some of the Philippines’ needs in terms of military equipment and training “to compensate for our lack of resources,” he said the Philippines would also want to explore other means of acceptable assistance and cooperation from Washington, such as more joint exercises with the US military and “a rotating and more frequent presence by them.”

“Such cooperative efforts would as well result in achieving a balance of influence to ensure peace, stability and economic development in the region,” he said.

The Philippines has been locked in a decades-long dispute with China over competing claims to territories in the West Philippine Sea (South China Sea), but the tensions have escalated during the past year over what the Philippines considers increasing Chinese bullying.

US President Barack Obama last year highlighted a shifting US defense strategy with a greater military focus on Asia, where China’s new assertiveness has rattled Washington’s allies.

Keep China out

In Malacañang, Ricky Carandang, head of the Presidential Communications Development and Strategic Planning Office, on Friday said keeping China out of undisputed Philippine territories in the West Philippine Sea was one of the motivations for negotiating an expanded US presence in the country.

According to Carandang, there was a convergence of interests in the Philippines’ need to upgrade its defense capability and the US desire to make its presence felt in the Asia Pacific.

“They (the US) are not just talking to the Philippines. They’re also in discussions with other countries in Asia like Vietnam, Singapore, Thailand and Australia,” he said.

“What we are trying to do is to enhance our capability to defend our territory,” he said.

“We’re doing this in cooperation not just with the United States but also with Australia and other Asian neighbors … that’s part and parcel of our efforts to enhance our defense capabilities,” Carandang said.

No basing arrangements

Amid an outcry of protest from militants over the expansion of US military presence, Del Rosario stressed that any agreement resulting from the new talks with the US would be “consistent with our treaty obligations and in accordance with Philippine laws and the Constitution.”

The US military buildup would be in accordance with Philippine law, which bans any foreign troops from being permanently based in the country, he and other officials said.

The US and the Philippines signed a mutual defense treaty in 1951 which provides that both countries would support each other if either of them were to be attacked by a third country.

The US had large military bases in the Philippines until 1992, but was forced to abandon them after the Senate voted to kick them out.

In 1999, the two countries also concluded a bilateral Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) to govern that status of temporarily deployed Filipino and American troops.

Rotating force of 600

A rotating force of about 600 US troops has been stationed in Mindanao for the past decade, training Filipino soldiers in how to fight Islamic extremists.

Carandang also denied that there were any discussions on any form of basing for the US military.

“None of these initiatives involves any kind of basing arrangements similar to what we had prior to 1991 so we’re not bringing back the bases similar to Subic and Clark prior to 1991,” he said, adding that the discussions are still “at an early stage.”

Budget Secretary Florencio Abad said the government would be open to an agreement “for as long as no basing rights are granted and the arrangement for their presence falls within the (Visiting Forces Agreement) framework.”

Gazmin also said the Philippines is considering a US proposal to deploy surveillance aircraft on a temporary, rotating basis to enhance its ability to guard disputed areas in the West Philippine Sea.

He said the ongoing discussions in Washington on the expansion of military cooperation include plans to deploy more littoral combat ships and spy aircraft, said Gazmin.

A Philippine military source told Reuters the head of the US Pacific Command had proposed last August the deployment of P-3C Orion surveillance aircraft.  More talks are due in Washington in March. With a report from Gil C. Cabacungan

Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin , Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario , Maritime Law Enforcement Instructors Development Course , Philippine Coast Guards , United States Coast Guards

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.
  • http://joboni96.myopenid.com/ joboni96

    ‘Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario on Friday said the Philippines would accept an increased United States military presence’

    ano kaya legal acrobatics
    ang gagawin ni sec del rosario
    para magawa ito
    under our constitution

    ngayon pa lang
    kontra na sa ating konstitusyon
    ang mga tagong stealth bases ng u.s.
    sa mindanao and other areas

    nawawalan ako ng believe kay del rosario
    isasalang tayo sa gitna ng
    u.s. – tsina war

    better go with asean japan sokor and taiwan

  • Artemio Piquero

    “….Gazmin on Friday also said the Philippines is considering the US proposal to deploy a surveillance aircraft on a temporary, rotating basis to enhance its ability to guard disputed areas in the West Philippine Sea…”

    =meaning. the Philippines will be the U.S.’s 12th battle carrier group.

  • Artemio Piquero

    When Americans come, Filipinos die.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_LKA37D2TEPNGTSWALPHAOA3FF4 Jun

    its better kaysa wala tayong depensa. ang mga leftist, wala namang ginawa kundi magrally sa US embassy. ba’t hindi sila nagrarally sa Chinese embassy? pa kunwaring patriot kuno pero wala namang nagawang tama para sa bayan

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_LKA37D2TEPNGTSWALPHAOA3FF4 Jun

    baket, nasa constitution din ba ang pagpasok ng mga barko ng China sa territory ng Pilipinas? mahirap kasi sa ating mga Pinoy, masyadong mataas ang pride, wala namang ipagmalaki at dapat tanggapin na lang natin na wala tayong kalaban-laban sa pangbubully ng China. hindi rin tayo ma protektahan nga mga ASEAN countries dahil nanghihingi din sila ng tulong ng US para sa kanilang depensa

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NXU2XGAHFDYLAQULE3TMTR6SWU Brando

    Let us allow the Americans to reeestablish their bases here in the Philippines. What is sovereignty if we can not protect it? Let us ask for Uncle Sam’s help.

  • http://twitter.com/brto77 cordero robert

    dapat itayo ulit ang mga base ng amerikano dito satin.para my malakas tayo na depensa.encase  na aatakihin tayo ng ibang malaking bansa..

  • Artemio Piquero

    Singapore is a U.S. ally, but Lee Kuan Yew went to Beijing almost every month when he was PM.

    The Philippines can be an ally to the U.S. but Filipino leaders should be going to Beijing everyweek.

    The U.S. has the gun. China got the gold.

    Filipino leaders should not once again get lulled into die-hardly/doggedly follow Washington’s command.

    Just remember Washington plays several sides of the game.

    Take the Singapore model. Play both U.S. and China for Philippine’s interest (not for the U.S. nor China’s interest).

  • Nic Legaspi

    We should appreciate any amount of help we could get at this time, until such time we can rebuild our military. As long as permanent US bases are not established here, then we’ll be fine. So far, it has been in the US’ best interests to protect the region, and it will be in our best interests too, to have a superpower ready to come to our defense, at the moment. Countries like Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan will be protected by the US when war comes, but I don’t hear them complaining.

  • Anonymous

    The Americans need to stop giving the Philippine Government money and military aid. The American Government is does not have the money to be wasting in a country outside of the United States. The Philippines is on the other side of the earth from the United States so why worry about what happens in the Philippines. Maybe China can give the Philippines money and aid. The United States sure do not need the Philippines. All the Philippines want is American Government money and aid.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IYNCLALDBQWG6EDPRLEAFGVMWU Joseph

    When the chicoms comes we all die..

  • Anonymous

    The US will not setup new bases. At FoxNews website yesterday:

    “WASHINGTON –  Defense Secretary Leon Panetta unveiled a plan Thursday that would cut nearly a half-trillion dollars from the defense budget over the next decade by retiring older planes and ships, delaying some projects and shrinking U.S. ground forces by about 100,000….”

    They will just increase their ability to strike from aircraft carriers and existing bases. 

    Hmmm. We should offer to buy their older planes and ships….Their old is not too old for our purpose.

  • Anonymous

    Some of their people like ours are complaining, you just don’t hear them. The only complain is interference to internal affairs or policy making. They do welcome military support.

    It’s in US best interest to have a balance of power in the region…but not to protect it since they have a huge financial problem now (read the news). It would be in their best interest for PH and its other allies to protect the balance. 

    Yes we should appreciate any help, but not the kind that would only end up in some people’s pockets or make the PH forever be dependent. We should start rebuilding our military for self-defense and mutual cooperation. If the US is sincere in helping us, they should help us obtain the technology to make defense equipment.

  • Anonymous

    Not gonna happen. Read the US news.

  • Nic Legaspi

    Yes, it is in the best interest of the US to protect the region because of the economic repercussions a war in the area could bring. Military power is part of this plan, even though it is already recognized in the NEWS that they’re doing this despite cutting budgets for military spending.

    As I said, there is nothing wrong with accepting help, UNTIL SUCH TIME when we can rebuild our military.

    If I find the US (or any other country) to be meddling in our internal affairs, then I’m sure that I, along with most Filipinos, would be up in arms over this, but as of now, this is not happening, so I’m fine with the discussion we’re having with the US.

  • Faith Diao

    The Pentagon is asking the Philippines to ask the U.S. for military help.The U.S. should really stop militarizing Asia. Enough wars and killing already.If the U.S. wants the Spratly’s then it should file a claim too in the U.N…..heck…everybodyelse does.

  • Anonymous

    It is infinitely better that there is strong US presence in the Philippines than Chinese encroachment in our territory. The present reality is, the AFP has no capability to properly secure the maritime boarders of the country because of corruption and decades of neglect to the needs of the AFP. We need the assistance of allies like the US. Even other more progressive countries like south korea, japan, australia and singapore need the help of US military presence in the region.

    It is only now that the AFP is getting proper attention. Despite limited resources, PNoy is actually doing a good job in the modernization of the AFP compared to 10 years of arroyo.

  • Anonymous

    TAWAGAN ANG MGA KABAKLAAN NA ALYADO NI ABNOY NOYNOY AT ILABAN SA MGA

     INTSIK NG SABUNUTAN. NGAYON DIN AT DI NA NATIN KAILANGAN YANG MGA 

    AMERIKANO NA YAN. 

  • Anonymous

    The way you talk, it can not be denied ikaw ang bakla turkak.LOL!!

  • Anonymous

    ANO KAILANGAN MO, INTSIK?

  • Anonymous

    Hoy, intsik, yung mga ka-alyado mong intsik ang nag-mimilitarize sa Asia. Sila ang nag-simula ng gulo sa Spratlys, hindi ang US o Pilipinas.

  • Anonymous

    Maybe China can give an aid? HAHAHAHAHAHAAHA! Kulangot ng intsik ang ibibigay sa yo.

  • Anonymous

    GOOGLE this topic below:

    U.S. not seeking permanent military bases in Southeast Asia

    ===============================================
    The U.S. says it has a national interest in peaceful resolution of the territorial conflicts and freedom of navigation in the South China Sea — where Brunei, Malaysia, Vietnam and Taiwan also have claims. The waters are also home to some of the world’s busiest shipping lanes.

    “Certainly freedom of navigation in the South China Sea is something we share an
    interest in and something that we are interested in protecting together,” Nuland told a news conference.

    Earlier, in Manila, Philippines Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin said any additional joint
    military activity would conform with the 1999 agreement that allows U.S. ship and aircraft to visit and resupply, and for joint military exercises in the Philippines.

    The Philippine Senate voted in 1991 to close major U.S. military bases in the country, but since 2002 hundreds of U.S. troops have been training and arming Filipino soldiers
    fighting al-Qaida-linked militants in a Muslim-majority region of the southern Philippines.

    The talks in Washington involve the top U.S. diplomat for East Asia, Kurt Campbell, and Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense Peter Lavoy. Their Philippine counterparts are
    Foreign Affairs Undersecretary Erlinda Basilio and Defense Undersecretary Pio Lorenzo Batino.

    During the talks, the Philippines will discuss requests for an additional U.S. Coast Guard
    cutter, a squadron of F-16 fighter jets and other weapons the Philippines needs to bolster its territorial defense, Philippine defense spokesman Peter Paul Galvez said.

  • Anonymous

    No U.S. meddling?  Just wondering kse wika ng kano ang ginagamit mo.  Or British english, di ko kasi masabi kung ano’ng accent ang gamit mo….

  • Anonymous

    No need for US mil presence. PH has P70B budget for military equipment. While protecting the region, more jobs could be generated in both US and PH.

    US should sell to PH the finished but abandoned $1.2B F-20A Tigershark program and technology of Northrop for half the price or less. It will give us the capability to refurbish and upgrade our decommissioned F-5s into F-5E/F. It will also allow us to build enough new Tigersharks for self-defense. US could sell the critical parts.

    DO NOT BUY FIGHTERS like several expensive F-16 or -18. without the ability to upgrade or build them, they’l just be obsolete sooner or later or crash and we’ll end up with nothing again eventually.

    PH should also acquire NH90 or Super Lynx multi-role helicopters for anti-ship/submarine, search and rescue, air to ground support, and troop transport. These can be carried by Coast Guard cutters or based on land.

    Buy second hand but young C-130s and more second-hand coast guard cutters with helipads and on board medical facilities.

    and brand new bullet-proof vests, personal radio communication, and night vision equipment for our special forces.

  • http://twitter.com/captmanny1 Manny Ucat

    Chinese Colony no. VFA yes.

  • http://twitter.com/_JayAquino Jay

    ibagsak ang rehimeng aquino-USA. bwahahahahaha abnoy kc

  • Anonymous

    Here is a counter proposal from the Philippines that will expand  the current  proposal from both side that are already being discussed between the US and PH.

    - The Philippines will build a series of military bases in its western coast that span the length of the entire Philippine archipeleogo that ran north to south, starting from the northern most Philippines in the Batanes Islands all the way down to the south of the Philippines near its border with Malaysia.
    - The military bases will be like a string of pearls running from north to south which will be composed of Navy bases, Air Force bases, and a bases for a battery of anti-ship, shore-to-ship missile that can sunk even the biggest aircraft carrier in the world.
    - These military bases will be use to project military force west of the West Philippine sea in order to protect Philippine territories beyond its western coastlines .
    - The Philippines will ask the US to help fund and build the Philippines owned bases in exchange for the Philipines giving the US access to these basis. (i.e. US surveillance plane being station there, etc.)
    - The Philippines will even allow some of the bases to be build with US specification so that the rotating military presence by the U.S. in the country will have a ready-made facility to disembarked to.  Think of it in the context of an Inn board and lodging. 
    - The Philippines will want a modern air umbrella and a modern air defense system that the US. can provide with discount pricing.  The training and the know-how is also provided by the US in the philosophy of give a person a fish he eats for a day but if you teach a man how to fish he eats for a lifetime (knowledge and know-how transfer).
    etc. etc.

  • Anonymous

    We only have two choices: Chinese hegemony or American imperialism.  I will choose the latter.

  • Anonymous

    We should be hearing soon from Estrada and Enrile as these two are the most strident anti-American in Phippine politics. But you know what? I would rather hear of in-port visits from the US Navy than ship visits from the Peoples Republic of China. After all, there are many Fil-Ams in the US Navy and US Marine Corps and probably zero Pinoys in the Chinese Navy.

  • gunn billy

    Di na kailangang ikumpara ang military technology ng Pilipinas sa US. Sa mga mukha palang ng nasa piktyur kitang-kita na ang malaking pagkakaiba! LOL

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GLLLMBSX5AMH3KQSHIIRQQYRGM milo go

    Americans are reducing their footprint all over the world due to budget constraint. The new thinking and strategy coming out from the Pentagon is project power thru 11 aircraft carrier groups and maintain a strategic parnership with friendly countries thru joint training and deployment of heavy weapons in those friendly countries in case of conventional conflict. The USA is fighting an assymmetric war against Al Qaeda and affliliated organizations using special forces and drones. USA interest in the pacific is to keep all sea lanes open for commerce and its Pacific strategy is anchored by Japan where it maintains a large footprint in Okinawa and the pacific 7th fleet is headquaters in Yokosuka and has 47,000 US forces in Japan. There is no need for US forces in the Philippines plus it will not be politically acceptable. The US is reducing its footprint in Okinawa and re-deploying its forces and equipment in Guam. New technologies is making it virtually possible for the US forces to project power with less conventional forces with the new assymetric warfare

  • Anonymous

    Yes the Philippines will be the U.S 12th battle group that would fight China’s expansionism.  Some personnel in this battle group will go after you so they could deport you to China.

  • Anonymous

    “The U.S. had large military bases in the Phililppines  until 1992, but was forced to abandon them, after the Senate voted to kick them out.”  This is a BLATANT LIE……..the TRUTH is…..the U.S. CLOSED these bases, because they further found NO NEED OF THEM…..since the Soviet Union IMPLODED…….and DID NOT represent a further THREAT to the peace and STABILITY of the region.  

    First of all….you just don’t “kick out” a GOOD FRIEND  that you’ve had for many years…and then SUDDENLY out of the blue……. ”call them back” because you are AFRAID of CHINA’S growing INFLUENCE…..to SAFEGUARD your National Interests, like the SPRATLEYS.

    Let’s “call a spade, a spade”.  It was a MUTUALLY agreeable turn of events, that AMERICA left, simply because SUBIC BAY was NOT NEEDED anymore, since RUSSIA….was NO LONGER a THREAT. ….and therefore…DID NOT NEED  a further MAINTENANCE of these bases.  To begin with, the Philippines is a very small country…..and IS NOT in a POSITION to “kick out” a good  friend ..like AMERICA.

    You CANNOT just “push a button” and say…..listen AMERICA…..we “need you” once again, to PROTECT our Philippine INTERESTS.

    The PHILIPPINES “needs” AMERICA…..more than AMERICA…..”needs” the PHILIPPINES. Or to put it in another way……”it would be MORE beneficial, TO work TOGETHER…..to the BENEFIT of our MUTUAL INTERESTS”…..since this would be a “Win-Win” situation.

    CORRECTO?…I’m of course….BIASED…..since…..I’m an AMERICAN. And trust me…..I read ALL ABOUT your news reports!

  • Anonymous

    You are partly right,  US did not left because  Philippines said so,  US just do not want to clean up after the pinatubo eruption. Look at Cuba, Camp Gitmo still there.

  • Anonymous

    US is not afraid of china, no single country can match US in conventional war no matter what they say.   In my opinion, the US  posturing  in the Philippine is more geared towards the domestic problem, particularly the muslim, communist and training ground of al-quida terrorists, s were the US is most vulnerable.

  • Anonymous

    buti na lang hindi baketball ang laban. hehehe

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YAYZCQ4KSBQRKR2LLGX5XRMXFI pepe

    better than never…

    US-RP have a long standing brotherhood not just because we talk same language but we believe in democratic way of life, we are both Christians, with similar cultures, with gender equality, and perhaps of more than 3 million Filipino in US and more than 300 thousand American or possible more than that in our country.

    The US presence will provide us room for improvement in our military capabilities and other necessities.

  • Anonymous

    Nagtataka ako sa mga pilipino parang proud na proud sila sa mga US Forces na nasa Pilipinas, kung magkaron ng intrusion ang  China sa atin di naman tayo matutulungan ng US na yan kasi ang laki ng utang ng mga yan sa China, kundi sa tulong ng China sa US lugmok na lugmok na sila sa kahirapan. Huwag na huwag nating kalimutan ito mga kababayan na ang US ay tumakbo sa China upang buhayin lang ang kanilang naghihingalo na economiya at tinulungan naman sila ng China. Sa tingin niyo ba sa laki ng utang ng loob ng US sa China tutulungan tayo ng US kung magkaron tayo ng conflict sa China ? Di lang natin maamin na ginagamit lang tayo ng mga Amerikano na yan sa propaganda nila !!!!

    Americans will never engage in any war to start in Asia because of the lesson they learned in

    Vietnam War, where they lost !!!!! It is a very painful lost to Uncle Sam up until now.

  • Anonymous

    This is simply to deter / intimidate chinese aggression in the spratlys and maintain PEACE in the region.. US power is overwhelming, since one nuclear powered submarine alone ( with 18 nuclear heads and each head has 20x more powerful than drop in Hiroshima)  can pulverize the whole China at an instant. There are 18 aircraft carrier (each with battle group) vs China 1 but bulok pa at considered under experimentation.. Do you think China will fight? Lets be practical, without US in our side we can easily be bullied.   

  • Anonymous

    ako_si   you are talking of US Militarty logistics AND MIGHT ? right ?   you are so funny  !!

    hahahahahahaha  yung perang ginagamit ng US to maintain their military facilities and 

    logistics eh !!  AT PANG-RECOVER SA ECONOMY SLUMP NILA  -  UTANG SA China 

    eh !!!!!!   hahahahahahahahahahahaha HOW WOULD YOU DARE TO MAKE WAR TO

    YOUR SAVIOUR ? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  • Anonymous

    CHANGING SOUTH CHINA SEA TO WEST PHILIPPINE SEA AY ISANG RESULTA NG 

    PAGKASIRA NG ULO NI ABNOY NOYNOY. MAG-ABROAD KA AT IPAGTANONG KUNG MAY

     ALAM SILANG WEST PHILIPPINE SEA SA ASIAN REGION ANG MAHIHITA MONG SAGOT

    AY “NEVER HEARD OF IT ” AT KAHIHIYAN.  WALA NAMANG INTERNATIONAL 

    RECOGNITION ITONG GINAWA NI ABNOY NA ITO. RESEARCH MO INTERNATIONAL 

    GEOGRAPHY MAP WALA KANG MAKIKITANG WEST PHILIPPINE SEA KUNDI SOUTH 

    CHINA SEA . 

    PAPANO RERESPONDE SA ATTACK ANG MGA KANO KUNG SASABIHIN MO SA WEST 

    PHILIPPINE SEA NANGYARI ANG INTRUSION PATI SILA MAGUGULUHAN AT MALILIGAW 

    KASI WALA NAMAN WEST PHILIPPINE SEA SA MAPA.

    ANG PANGULO AT PROSECUTIONS NG IMPEACHMENT AY IISA ANG TINATAKBO NG 

    UTAK-  ANG MANGGULO.

    PROSECUTORS GINUGULO ANG IMPEACHMENT TRIAL SAMANTALANG ANG PANGULO 

    GINUGULONG PILIT ANG ASEAN INTERNATIONAL GEOGRAPHICAL MAPPING ZONE.

  • Anonymous

    Kaya uumasenso ang China dahil sa pandaraya nila, they are artificially devaluing their currency.  Ito ang dahilan kaya pwede nilang bbabaang ang presyo ng mga produkto nila.  Yes the United States can wage war against China anytime so all their debts to China can be forfeited. 

  • Faith Diao

    I agree with A. Piquero:Singapore is a U.S. ally, but Lee Kuan Yew went to Beijing almost every month when he was PM.The Philippines can be an ally to the U.S. but Filipino leaders should be going to Beijing everyweek.The U.S. has the gun. China got the gold.Filipino leaders should not once again get lulled into die-hardly/doggedly follow Washington’s command.Just remember Washington plays several sides of the game.Take the Singapore model. Play both U.S. and China for Philippine’s interest (not for the U.S. nor China’s interest).

  • Anonymous

    Turkak-> Member ka ba ng leftist? hahaha.. Taiwan lang ang iharap ko sa china.. nanginginig na sila sa takot… you know why? kasi nakaparada yung USS G. Washington sa tabi.. hahaha..

  • http://joboni96.myopenid.com/ joboni96

    kaya nga magpapalakas ng depensa
    sa sarili nating kakayahan at
    mga asean and neighbors natin

    ang solusyon mo
    dahil sa takot
    magpakolonya ulit sa u.s.

    nakolonyang utak talaga
    sobra kasi facebook mo
    nadeskaril na

  • Anonymous

    Try to remember those ill-fated December, in years early fortys, when we were under the Imperial Japan. People borne not on that will remember not he horrendous life we do endured. If we were not an ally of the United State at that time and not “liberated” us we will be under the rule of the Nippon imperial army, believe me you wont like to live like that. We are a little poor country but somehow we have what other strong big country desire to covet us. We do need help for someone who offer to help us, let us not be too proud. The world are full of bullies. We need friends not conquerors to take whatever they like. Spartlys are just a feeler to take, if successful then what next, Palawan, Cebu or the whole nation. Let us have at least a deterrent,  Japan yestrday, China tomorrow!  Things to consider. Let he future generation be the future Generation.

  • Anonymous

    turkak, basaem diay article ni ako_si tano maawatam daytoy nga banag. (Translated: turkak, basahin mo itong article ni ako_si para maunawaan mo itong bagan na ito.

  • http://joboni96.myopenid.com/ joboni96

    pareng Gil C. Cabacungan
    saan mo ba nakuha
    yung headline na yan

    sigurado sa mga
    u.s. collaborators

  • christian sison

    The possibility of partnership bet PHIL and
    US for greater national security in the Pacific will give upper hand to our
    side. It will boost our capability to immediately respond to the various national
    crises (natural/man-made). In the context disaster preparedness, partnership
    may even strengthen the role of the Philippine armed force in a wide ranging
    socio and economic security including environmental security affairs because of
    its links with other armed forces in the world. 
    Military planners and leaders must respond to the challenge of the new
    security paradigm so they can effectively reach out to as many people and
    groups as possible to ensure that human development and wellbeing of the
    Filipino people.
     

  • Anonymous

    sa totoo lang ang Ph ay parang Tibet kung “kunin” ng communist China, walang puersa na ilaban sa mga invaders, ni hindi kaya ng bansa ang mga CPP-NPAs/bandits na walang mga sapatos, he, he, he? ang pagyayabang lang ang malakas sa Ph,. tsk, tsk, tsk, kaya pulubi pa rin hanggang ngayon, tsk, tsk, tsk! palaging umaasa sa ibang bansa ng tulong at mga utang, tsk, tsk, tsk! ang “corruptions” ang nagpagupo sa bansa after 1946 independence from the USA, bumagsak dahil sa kayabangan, maraming ” alila ” (OFWs) ang pinalabas as dollar earners, para makabayad sa mga utang sa ibang bansa, tsk, tsk, tsk!



Copyright 2011 . All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement
  1. US suit tags Pagcor execs
  2. Ibuna lawyer: Aleli not Ignacio Arroyo’s legal wife due to technicality
  3. ‘Dirty finger’ gets OFW in trouble
  4. 45-year-old US ship for transfer to Philippine Navy has defects
  5. Manila mayor fires police official over kidnap-extortion of 4 Korean tourists
  6. Government lifts ‘au pair’ ban to Europe
  7. Former Pagcor chief denies getting gifts from Okada
  8. Maid kills Singaporean widow after being called stupid
  9. Why Jeremy Lin matters (and Floyd’s rant doesn’t make sense)
  10. Taiwanese official deported after abusing Filipinos
  1. Ex-PH envoy to Mexico held for concubinage, posts bail
  2. Maid kills Singaporean widow after being called stupid
  3. Why Jeremy Lin matters (and Floyd’s rant doesn’t make sense)
  4. Fight is over Rep. Ignacio Arroyo’s assets, says lawyer
  5. US suit tags Pagcor execs
  6. The trials of Al Capone and CJ Corona
  7. Indian airline official shot dead in Parañaque City
  8. Vatican schedules canonization of Pedro Calungsod
  9. Filipino doctor, wanted in US, now a medical reservist in AFP
  10. Manila antidrug units dissolved after illegal arrest of 4 Koreans
  1. Fight is over Rep. Ignacio Arroyo’s assets, says lawyer
  2. ‘My OFW husband came home a different man’
  3. How hard is it to get a US visa?
  4. Bigger US military role in Philippines sought
  5. Ex-PH envoy to Mexico held for concubinage, posts bail
  6. Smell of decay leads to body of Arab tourist in Manila hotel room
  7. Filipino doctor, wanted in US, now a medical reservist in AFP
  8. Maid kills Singaporean widow after being called stupid
  9. US won’t return bases in PH but welcomes offer of more troops
  10. 3 Russian Navy ships dock in Manila for 3-day visit

News

  • Cars stolen in Luzon recovered by police in Visayas, Mindanao
  • At least 33 killed in Iraq attacks
  • Arroyo hopes gov’t will uphold rule of law, laments campaign vs Arroyos
  • An eyewitness or Justice Sereno testifying could save prosecution, says Santiago
  • Senate junks De Lima’s testimony as hearsay
  • Sports

  • Westbrook, Durant power Thunder past Celtics
  • Jeremy Lin to miss dunk moment but will fill bookshelves
  • Pacquiao ‘embarrassed’ by Mayweather offer
  • Manny Pacquiao swept up in Linsanity
  • Don’t wait for P-Noy to save boxing
  • Lifestyle

  • PF Chang’s first Asian branch opens–to long wait lists
  • ‘Tikuron or tikoy turon’
  • Oriental Citrus Salad, Herb Pan-fried Fish–Mama Maimee, it’s good ol’ comfort food!
  • Burrata Cheese Ravioli, Burger with Foie Gras, ‘snowball tiramisu’–chow time in Hong Kong
  • ‘Udang Goreng Chilli Garam’ (Chili Prawns)–a Peranakan favorite
  • Entertainment

  • Sepia-tinted statuettes? Oscar films look to past
  • ‘Bourne’ star leaves ‘legacy’ in Palace visit
  • Through the years …
  • As Pinoy as the jeepney
  • Modern-day superhero
  • Business

  • Puregold Price Club net profit tripled to P1.54B in 2011
  • Oil prices lower on weak Europe, China data
  • No change in PSE index
  • Again, oil firms up prices
  • PPP schools project attracts 15 firms
  • Technology

  • US attorneys general pressure Google on privacy
  • Company sues Apple over iPad name in Shanghai
  • Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom released on bail
  • New York taxis could get iPads—report
  • Google under fire for sidestepping track-blocking software
  • Opinion

  • Editorial cartoon, February 23, 2012
  • Wisdom, not legality
  • People power
  • The algorithm of kindness
  • ‘Medicare portability’ for Fil-Ams
  • Global Nation

  • 12 OFWs return from strife-torn Syria; 973 so far repatriated
  • Philippine Immigration issues reminder on annual reporting of aliens
  • Okay to buy warships but don’t bring US into Spratly dispute
  • Ibuna lawyer: Aleli not Ignacio Arroyo’s legal wife due to technicality
  • Government lifts ‘au pair’ ban to Europe
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    © Copyright 1997-2011 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved